The reality is that, when we transitioned to a standing army, the federal government -- and indeed state governments -- became an armed gang that extracts resources from the proles. When every voter is also in the military, that's not really the case so much.Fife wrote: Wed Nov 14, 2018 7:31 amHamilton had some doozies, alright.Speaker to Animals wrote: Tue Nov 13, 2018 2:18 pmGuess how it became a "rent-seeking armed-robbery mafia"..Fife wrote: Tue Nov 13, 2018 2:14 pm "Individual v. collective" is a false dichotomy.
The question is: "voluntary v. compulsory."
Or, if you prefer, "voluntary v. rent-seeking armed-robbery mafia"
Hint: it started with one of Hamilton's ideas.
![]()
Now.. I am not for fucking up a strong professional army just so people don't get fleeced by the state, myself. I would just make enfranchisement optional. All you have to do is enlist. I might even consider doing away with police and just making law enforcement a military role of some kind. That's just me, though.