2018 Mid-Term Elections

[C-Mag]

I don't want to put words in Speakers mouth, but I get the impression he wasn't saying nuclear weaponry was a way to eliminate election fraud. It seemed like he was saying we would get better election results if eliminated valid democratic voters clustered in cities.

Democrat civic leadership by objective measures are very incompetent and frankly disastrous to communities and states. Within a generation of Democrats establishing political dominance in a region economic growth slows and stops within a couple generations, debts increase, home and land prices skyrocket, violent crime grows and political corruption and inability to do the simplest tasks such as run an election become failures.

Based on what we have experienced from the Democrat Party all the way back to Tamany Hall, Slavery and Segregation, they are not fit to lead. I'm not one for genocide, that's in the Filthy Collectivist playbook, so I won't be signing on to that. However, we have no Republic without democratic elections. We are not seeing democracy in action with these elections. Democrats are just making the end result what they want it to be.

[Kath]

Look - you know me - I hate the GOP 80% of the time....but the alternative in this case is dire.

I'm grateful for a split Congress. Regardless of how awful the D-team is right now, having all three branches controlled by one team is not good for the country.

[Zlaxer]

Look - you know me - I hate the GOP 80% of the time....but the alternative in this case is dire.

I'm grateful for a split Congress. Regardless of how awful the D-team is right now, having all three branches controlled by one team is not good for the country.

You need to be looking 1-2 moves ahead Kath - DNC is going to have full control for foreseeable future in a few more cycles....

[Kath]

You need to be looking 1-2 moves ahead Kath - DNC is going to have full control for foreseeable future in a few more cycles....

...and so the pendulum swings. yawn.

[Zlaxer]

You need to be looking 1-2 moves ahead Kath - DNC is going to have full control for foreseeable future in a few more cycles....

...and so the pendulum swings. yawn.

More like get stuck - permanently.

[Kath]

More like get stuck - permanently.

One party has had control of all three branches for only a handful of years, in our entire history. Your panic is not warranted. We've survived bad ideas before. Plenty of them. We will survive this recent wave of nonsense coming from the left.

We swing too far to the right and give control to the left.
We split the government more often than not.
We swing too far to the left an give control to the right.

It's how it's always been and always will be for the duration of the Republic.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

I’m a liberal, those people you claim to be liberal are anything but. They are one step away from Che Vera.

You are going to have to point me to the liberal thinkers that recommend removing fellow citizens you disagree with like a cancer in order to preserve a pluralistic society. You should know where to find it, being a liberal and whatnot.

Look here Hanarchy.
I'm sure that once the one-party state has been achieved through violence all of your problems will go away.
After all, one-party states have such a good record of providing small government Liberal societies.

I get it now. If one believes there is room for the left to exist, that means you are, basically, a Nazi or something, because of immigration or something. Then we have entered 'natural law,' which means that eliminating the opposition is the pro-liberty, pro-freedom option.
Even though, after right-wing nut-job, Timothy McVeigh, bombed his fellow citizens, it didn't trigger a civil war, where 'natural law' reigned. Regular old law was sufficient for that situation.

[heydaralon]

I get it now. If one believes there is room for the left to exist, that means you are, basically, a Nazi or something, because of immigration or something. Then we have entered 'natural law,' which means that eliminating the opposition is the pro-liberty, pro-freedom option.
Even though, after right-wing nut-job, Timothy McVeigh, bombed his fellow citizens, it didn't trigger a civil war, where 'natural law' reigned. Regular old law was sufficient for that situation.

You are one smug son of a bitch, I'll give you that. I guess I don't think making light of the Oklahoma city tragedy is really appropriate fodder for your snide comments, but I guess that's because I'm a bit more patriotic than you are. Asshole.

PS stop sending me e-vites

[nmoore63]

More like get stuck - permanently.

One party has had control of all three branches for only a handful of years, in our entire history. Your panic is not warranted. We've survived bad ideas before. Plenty of them. We will survive this recent wave of nonsense coming from the left.

We swing too far to the right and give control to the left.
We split the government more often than not.
We swing too far to the left an give control to the right.

It's how it's always been and always will be for the duration of the Republic.

I think the modern tech certainly has the capability of flip an authoritarian government switch that would be hard to reverse.
I mean, this NSA stuff for example, if you truly can follow all the communications of the opposing... you are going to be able to win ever game...

[Kath]

I think the modern tech certainly has the capability of flip an authoritarian government switch that would be hard to reverse.
I mean, this NSA stuff for example, if you truly can follow all the communications of the opposing... you are going to be able to win ever game...

Agreed, but the two parties are in complete agreement over those important issues, like the MIC, Auditing the Fed, spying on citizens, perpetual war, overspending, growing the government, corruption, etc., and none of those agreements favor The Governed. The only real disagreements between the two parties is the wedge issue/divisive stuff. Other than that, no real difference that I can see.