Postby Speaker to Animals » Tue Nov 13, 2018 10:12 am
Article II
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
* Killing members of the group;
* Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
* Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
* Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
* Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
I can post for you countless examples of the democratic leadership lauding the displacement of white Americans through mass migration and lawlessly failing to enforce immigration laws. I can post for you countless examples of democratic party family law policies designed to destroy the white family and suppress the white birth rate.
If this were the other way around, if this were whites mass migrating to some country in Africa to replace the blacks there, you would call it genocide and colonialism. But somehow it's okay when it happens to us, and pointing out that if the democrats carry out their additional threats of treating whites as third class citizens (aka German Jewish treatment) we will respond appropriately, you act like we are the ones who want to fuck up the world (by subverting your pozzed agenda).
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
* Killing members of the group;
* Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
* Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
* Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
* Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
I can post for you countless examples of the democratic leadership lauding the displacement of white Americans through mass migration and lawlessly failing to enforce immigration reform. I can post for you countless examples of democratic party family law policies designed to destroy the white family and suppress the white birth rate.
If this were the other way around, if this were whites mass migrating to some country in Africa to replace the blacks there, you would call it genocide and colonialism. But somehow it's okay when it happens to us, and pointing out that if the democrats carry out their additional threats of treating whites as third class citizens (aka German Jewish treatment) we will respond appropriately, you act like we are the ones who want to fuck up the world (by subverting your pozzed agenda).
Get fucked.
I heard somewhere that the democrats were racist for trying to push policies that resulted in black people having abortions.
If you going to peddle in paranoid nonsense, you could at least keep it marginally consistent bro.
HAIL!
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
Annihilating everyone who disagrees with you somewhat diminishes the need for democratic elections, now don't it?
When a scalpel to remove a tumor doesn't work, you use chemotherapy.
A nuke, in this case, is the US's version of Chemo.
Oooooooooh, I didn't understand. By nuking cities, you are getting rid of people you disagree with. It is so obvious now that you have doubled down on Zlaxer's cancer analogy. Liberals are bad. Cancer is bad. Instead of letting them vote, they should be removed, like cancer.
Still... why bother with national elections when political disagreements are solved with nukes?
I’m a liberal, those people you claim to be liberal are anything but. They are one step away from Che Vera.
When a scalpel to remove a tumor doesn't work, you use chemotherapy.
A nuke, in this case, is the US's version of Chemo.
Oooooooooh, I didn't understand. By nuking cities, you are getting rid of people you disagree with. It is so obvious now that you have doubled down on Zlaxer's cancer analogy. Liberals are bad. Cancer is bad. Instead of letting them vote, they should be removed, like cancer.
Still... why bother with national elections when political disagreements are solved with nukes?
I’m a liberal, those people you claim to be liberal are anything but. They are one step away from Che Vera.
You are going to have to point me to the liberal thinkers that recommend removing fellow citizens you disagree with like a cancer in order to preserve a pluralistic society. You should know where to find it, being a liberal and whatnot.
HAIL!
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
Oooooooooh, I didn't understand. By nuking cities, you are getting rid of people you disagree with. It is so obvious now that you have doubled down on Zlaxer's cancer analogy. Liberals are bad. Cancer is bad. Instead of letting them vote, they should be removed, like cancer.
Still... why bother with national elections when political disagreements are solved with nukes?
I’m a liberal, those people you claim to be liberal are anything but. They are one step away from Che Vera.
You are going to have to point me to the liberal thinkers that recommend removing fellow citizens you disagree with like a cancer in order to preserve a pluralistic society. You should know where to find it, being a liberal and whatnot.
No - dude - doesn't work like that - The left is going to spark civil strife....then it will be a contest of might....once you go past the line and enter natural law...nothing else fucking matters.
Oooooooooh, I didn't understand. By nuking cities, you are getting rid of people you disagree with. It is so obvious now that you have doubled down on Zlaxer's cancer analogy. Liberals are bad. Cancer is bad. Instead of letting them vote, they should be removed, like cancer.
Still... why bother with national elections when political disagreements are solved with nukes?
I’m a liberal, those people you claim to be liberal are anything but. They are one step away from Che Vera.
You are going to have to point me to the liberal thinkers that recommend removing fellow citizens you disagree with like a cancer in order to preserve a pluralistic society. You should know where to find it, being a liberal and whatnot.
Look here Hanarchy.
I'm sure that once the one-party state has been achieved through violence all of your problems will go away.
After all, one-party states have such a good record of providing small government Liberal societies.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
