2018 Mid-Term Elections

[Zlaxer]

This is how it will go down:

Immigration controls are coming. The majority of Americans, including most democrats, want it. The democratic party, in response, will be completely taken over by the Marxists. The liberals will join the GOP for the most part. The GOP will become the anti-Marxist coalition party, and they will win national power for a good long time.

The white Marxists will see their fate as the demographic winter approaches. They will see they cannot hope to destroy the rest of the white rave along with themselves. They will take to terrorism (that is not far off as it stands) to target whites. I think they will target white men first, bit towards the end they will go after children.

The urban-rural divide thus will accelerate to civil war, and we will essentially lock them in there if we have to so that they die out without causing more problems than they have already.


The left is death. It is the death of civilization. That's all it is.

Won't work unless brown Americans eventually reject collectivism.

Birthright citizenship will end. Most of the illegals will be sent back. We will decimate welfare if we have to in order that these people escort themselves out.

Dude...DNC will have full control of the govenrment in a few election cycles...they'll pass a fucking law reinstating it.

[C-Mag]

Annihilating everyone who disagrees with you somewhat diminishes the need for democratic elections, now don't it?

Democratic Elections hinge on integrity of valid voting and counting, otherwise you just have Democrat Elections.

[Zlaxer]

The solution is to bankrupt the federal government. That will destroy it. With it gone, the States will regain their sovereignty.


Fucking Balkanization man - Commies loose but Ruskies and PRC win.

[Fife]

See your future.




There is no fuckery that cannot be justified by a "democratic election." The 20th century was, just, like 10 minutes ago, fam.

[The Conservative]

Imagine if right now, New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Seattle were utterly destroyed, along with everybody in the city limits.

How would national elections go after that?

Annihilating everyone who disagrees with you somewhat diminishes the need for democratic elections, now don't it?

When a scalpel to remove a tumor doesn't work, you use chemotherapy.

A nuke, in this case, is the US's version of Chemo.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Annihilating everyone who disagrees with you somewhat diminishes the need for democratic elections, now don't it?

Democratic Elections hinge on integrity of valid voting and counting, otherwise you just have Democrat Elections.

I don't want to put words in Speakers mouth, but I get the impression he wasn't saying nuclear weaponry was a way to eliminate election fraud. It seemed like he was saying we would get better election results if eliminated valid democratic voters clustered in cities.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Imagine if right now, New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Seattle were utterly destroyed, along with everybody in the city limits.

How would national elections go after that?

Annihilating everyone who disagrees with you somewhat diminishes the need for democratic elections, now don't it?

When a scalpel to remove a tumor doesn't work, you use chemotherapy.

A nuke, in this case, is the US's version of Chemo.

Oooooooooh, I didn't understand. By nuking cities, you are getting rid of people you disagree with. It is so obvious now that you have doubled down on Zlaxer's cancer analogy. Liberals are bad. Cancer is bad. Instead of letting them vote, they should be removed, like cancer.

Still... why bother with national elections when political disagreements are solved with nukes?

[Zlaxer]

Oooooooooh...you have doubled down on Zlaxer's cancer analogy. Liberals are bad. Cancer is bad. Instead of letting them vote, they should be removed, like cancer.

We're not talking about "liberals" - It's collectivism....which is the exact opposite of liberalism....and yes...collectivism is a cancer that needs to be expunged from this world.

[Speaker to Animals]

Annihilating everyone who disagrees with you somewhat diminishes the need for democratic elections, now don't it?

Democratic Elections hinge on integrity of valid voting and counting, otherwise you just have Democrat Elections.

I don't want to put words in Speakers mouth, but I get the impression he wasn't saying nuclear weaponry was a way to eliminate election fraud. It seemed like he was saying we would get better election results if eliminated valid democratic voters clustered in cities.

FIFY:

We would get non-genocidal election results if the urban electorate were not a factor in elections.

You seem very desperate to paint me as somebody who actually wants to exterminate cities. That says more about the poverty of your position than anything else.

My actual statement was to the effect that, if white urban liberals continue to attempt to genocide the rest of us along with themselves, the rest of us will destroy them first. The self-defense against genocide aspect is irrelevant to you probably because you want the genocide.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Democratic Elections hinge on integrity of valid voting and counting, otherwise you just have Democrat Elections.

I don't want to put words in Speakers mouth, but I get the impression he wasn't saying nuclear weaponry was a way to eliminate election fraud. It seemed like he was saying we would get better election results if eliminated valid democratic voters clustered in cities.

FIFY:

We would get non-genocidal election results if the urban electorate were not a factor in elections.

You seem very desperate to paint me as somebody who actually wants to exterminate cities. That says more about the poverty of your position than anything else.

My actual statement was to the effect that, if white urban liberals continue to attempt to genocide the rest of us along with themselves, the rest of us will destroy them first. The self-defense against genocide aspect is irrelevant to you probably because you want the genocide.

I understand your position. It isn't exactly opaque. The things urban democrats vote for are bad, and those bad things wouldn't get voted for if they didn't exist. It isn't rocket science.
The point is: if you are just getting rid of people who vote for the wrong stuff, you don't need voting at all. Just go full Fife, and post cute memes about how democracy is lame, and be done with it.