Feminism

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Feminism

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:07 am

This is how we get a good portion of feminists to our side.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/1 ... s-cycling/


Direct contradiction in the doctrine of equality that hurts women.

Women are not the athletic equals of men.

This also ruins women's sports in so many ways.

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Feminism

Post by C-Mag » Mon Oct 15, 2018 7:53 am

How in the fuck did crazy Lefties trick women into supporting destroying women in athletics ?

Here's another instance of a man, just destroying female competition. Biological Male Wins World Championship In Women’s Cycling
https://dailycaller.com/2018/10/14/biol ... mpionship/
Image
The caption should read, pudgy guy gets off the couch and puts down the game controller long enough to destroy fit women who trained for years.

It's happening in schools too. That's some awesome brain scrubbing to get women to accept this shit.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Feminism

Post by Speaker to Animals » Tue Oct 16, 2018 5:31 am

Here is an example of what I have been talking about.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) launched a bizarre Twitter rant late Monday afternoon following the disastrous rollout of DNA results that further debunked her decades-long claim to American Indian ancestry.

Warren’s thread of 20-plus (and counting) tweets began at about 5:30 p.m. ET, where she attempted to both insult President Trump and defend herself.

In her first tweet, and without any evidence, Warren made the outlandish claim that Trump “makes creepy physical threats about me.” The truth is that all Trump has ever done is ridicule her false claims about being Cherokee.

“We all know why @realDonaldTrump makes creepy physical threats about me, right? He’s scared,” Warren tweeted from her verified account. “He’s trying to do what he always does to women who scare him: call us names, attack us personally, shrink us down to feel better about himself. It may soothe his ego – but it won’t work.”

Warren linked comments Trump made Monday ridiculing Warren’s DNA test. After a reporter suggested Trump owed her an apology, an incredulous president responded, “I owe her? She owes the country an apology. What’s her percentage [of Indian ancestry]? 1/1,000th?”
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018 ... -disaster/


If a grown man did what she did, and behaved the way she did, he would be mercilessly ridiculed far in excess of what Warren suffered for it. But because she is a woman, she expects to be treated better than a man.

Except she is running for office in a male space. She wants us to pretend as though she is every bit as competent as a man, but then she doesn't want to be treated like a man. This isn't working. Women who want to go into industry, politics, armed forces, and so on need to accept the rules of the social sphere they wish to occupy. We cannot have an effective government where our female political leaders cry foul and try to schoolmarm men into apologizing for every perceived slight. What would President Warren do if, for example, a Russian leader mocked her lying and hijacking affirmative action from black people? Declare he hates women??

Get real.

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: Feminism

Post by Zlaxer » Tue Oct 16, 2018 6:38 am

Feminazis and soy boys will vote for her no matter what - we need to split away from them.

No sensein getting riled up - just realize that they value feelings over logic and that their world view is incompatiabke with yours and act accordigly.

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Feminism

Post by C-Mag » Tue Oct 16, 2018 7:06 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Tue Oct 16, 2018 5:31 am
This isn't working. Women who want to go into industry, politics, armed forces, and so on need to accept the rules of the social sphere they wish to occupy. We cannot have an effective government where our female political leaders cry foul and try to schoolmarm men into apologizing for every perceived slight. What would President Warren do if, for example, a Russian leader mocked her lying and hijacking affirmative action from black people? Declare he hates women??

Get real.
That's really the problem isn't it. For many traditional Male jobs, there are traditional Male standards. These people cannot accept that there are things women really can't do as well as men, and so they come in to prove it and end up changing the traditional Male Standard so they can compete.

I've been watching the stories of the US Military Feminization of traditional Infantry. They've gotten their first Female Rangers and graduated them through Marine Corps Rifleman Course. But they were given special treatment, and it's quite obvious too.

In Ranger Course the females were given more rest, lighter packs, lower physical standards, additional food, additional attempts at attaining a GO for task...……..and they got their political victory by having a 37 year old Mother of 2 win a Ranger Tab. This is school that regularly and mercilessly fails 20 year old Men in peak physical condition for 75 years. When men graduate Ranger school they look like gaunt survivors of the Bataan Death March, but this gal looked plump and rested.

Congratulations, you now have Bonnie Franklin defending you instead of CSM Plumley
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25284
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Feminism

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Tue Oct 16, 2018 8:45 pm

Well, to be fair, the Rangers don't actually "defend" anything. We might be slightly less effective at invading something, tho.

;)
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
pineapplemike
Posts: 4650
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm

Re: Feminism

Post by pineapplemike » Wed Oct 17, 2018 9:31 am


Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: Feminism

Post by Zlaxer » Wed Oct 17, 2018 10:03 am

pineapplemike wrote:
Wed Oct 17, 2018 9:31 am
damn check out Japan

Image
https://www.bloombergquint.com/pursuits ... ural-shift
John Santelli, a professor in population, family health and pediatrics at Columbia’s Mailman School of Public Health wrote: The trend will continue, there’s no doubt about it...We can’t go back to ’50s.

Umm...yes we can...if we want to....single parent = poverty. Poverty = proles = DNC voting plantation....Fuck Proles.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Feminism

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Oct 17, 2018 10:07 am

Stop rewarding thot behavior. Cut these women off from the gibs.

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: Feminism

Post by Zlaxer » Wed Oct 17, 2018 10:09 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Wed Oct 17, 2018 10:07 am
Stop rewarding thot behavior. Cut these women off from the gibs.
It takes two to tango....well....usually....Many homies have many baby momas....
It's a prole problem. We're infested with proles...and their breeding faster than they should.