Responses to Matriarchy vs. Patriarchy

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: Responses to Matriarchy vs. Patriarchy

Post by Zlaxer »

Fife wrote: Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:18 am I don't know where you work, but I guaran-goddam-tee you that picture would not be allowed in any civilian government office space if a single complaint was made.
Hmm - What about the USAF Chief? :Rollyclown:
User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28382
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Responses to Matriarchy vs. Patriarchy

Post by C-Mag »

MilSpecs wrote: Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:31 am
C-Mag wrote: Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:12 am It's not trolling, it's a serious question. Because the logical end result of the Social Justice +MeToo movements is these guys are Toxic Male Criminals and all evidence they existed will need to be destroyed.

At a more personal level, can I have this picture on the wall at work ?
I'd like MilSpecs perspective on this, if I had that picture up, would I be sexualizing the workplace?
History existed. It is what it is. That said, if that was a drawing of a Sambo would it be ok to put it up in an office?
Well, this isn't the racial debate thread, but I wouldn't be anymore offended by it than I am of images of Che Guevera or Mao............. which seem to be OK in our society.


Back to topic.
How far away are we from treating the crew of the Memphis Belle like Confederate statues because they can easily be seen as representing Toxic White Masculinity.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 19065
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Responses to Matriarchy vs. Patriarchy

Post by Martin Hash »

MilSpecs wrote: Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:35 am
Martin Hash wrote: Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:32 am
MilSpecs wrote: Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:23 am

Are you an authoritarian husband? Does your wife have equal agency?
Same as it’s always been during my lifetime until now you’re trying to change it: MAGA.
You didn’t answer either question.
I am master of our house. I thought that went without saying, and my wife would eat you up. She’s a Republican.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: Responses to Matriarchy vs. Patriarchy

Post by Zlaxer »

MilSpec - You married? If yes, then to a Male or Female? and do you have kids?
User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Responses to Matriarchy vs. Patriarchy

Post by DBTrek »

MilSpecs wrote: Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:34 am How about neither authoritarian marriages or single parent households be held up as the ideal?
How about we stick with the data demonstrating one is far superior to the other, unless you have additional data showing otherwise?

Because the data shows that the past is clearly healthier than the present in this case - which contradicts your claim that the past has always been “unhealthy”.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28382
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Responses to Matriarchy vs. Patriarchy

Post by C-Mag »

DBTrek wrote: Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:40 am
MilSpecs wrote: Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:34 am How about neither authoritarian marriages or single parent households be held up as the ideal?
How about we stick with the data demonstrating one is far superior to the other, unless you have additional data showing otherwise?

Because the data shows that the past is clearly healthier than the present in this case - which contradicts your claim that the past has always been “unhealthy”.
+1

The data clearly shows that heterosexual 2 parent homes raise the most productive, happiest and most well adjusted kids. Not just now, or 50 years ago, and not just in the US either.

It's overwhelming.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: Responses to Matriarchy vs. Patriarchy

Post by Zlaxer »

C-Mag wrote: Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:51 am
DBTrek wrote: Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:40 am
MilSpecs wrote: Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:34 am How about neither authoritarian marriages or single parent households be held up as the ideal?
How about we stick with the data demonstrating one is far superior to the other, unless you have additional data showing otherwise?

Because the data shows that the past is clearly healthier than the present in this case - which contradicts your claim that the past has always been “unhealthy”.
+1

The data clearly shows that heterosexual 2 parent homes raise the most productive, happiest and most well adjusted kids. Not just now, or 50 years ago, and not just in the US either.

It's overwhelming.

Gay parents better than no parents IMHO.
User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Responses to Matriarchy vs. Patriarchy

Post by DBTrek »

Zlaxer wrote: Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:52 am Gay parents better than no parents IMHO.
I suspect any parents > no parents.

But that’s not the point. I was simply looking for the easiest example of demonstrating that the past is not one giant panorama of “unhealthy”, and the present isn’t some magical paragon of “healthy” that sprang into existence like Athena from the head of Zeus.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: Responses to Matriarchy vs. Patriarchy

Post by Zlaxer »

DBTrek wrote: Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:58 am
Zlaxer wrote: Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:52 am Gay parents better than no parents IMHO.
I suspect any parents > no parents.

But that’s not the point. I was simply looking for the easiest example of demonstrating that the past is not one giant panorama of “unhealthy”, and the present isn’t some magical paragon of “healthy” that sprang into existence like Athena from the head of Zeus.
STFU you OWG - you didn't make shit in the past. :banana-ninja:
User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Responses to Matriarchy vs. Patriarchy

Post by DBTrek »

Zlaxer wrote: Fri Oct 12, 2018 10:13 am
DBTrek wrote: Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:58 am
Zlaxer wrote: Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:52 am Gay parents better than no parents IMHO.
I suspect any parents > no parents.

But that’s not the point. I was simply looking for the easiest example of demonstrating that the past is not one giant panorama of “unhealthy”, and the present isn’t some magical paragon of “healthy” that sprang into existence like Athena from the head of Zeus.
STFU you OWG - you didn't make shit in the past. :banana-ninja:
:lol:

I ain’t making shit now, either.
But the government still wants 28.75% of it.
:evil:
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"