Well, bully for your ass.
As for my sword, no need to be passive-aggressive about it, come right out and say what you mean.
Well, bully for your ass.
Everybody knows what he meant. You got only respect here, Fife.
Yup. There is no more care given into doing the right thing, constitutionally. It's all about sticking it to the other side. "Our number one priority is making sure Obama is a one-term president." Partisans suck.
You wanted a split. In a split, the conservatives would be left with less than the liberals.Fife wrote: ↑Wed Oct 10, 2018 10:30 amFar more powerful than what? As a statement of fact, that's ambiguous. Please explain the power relationship you are talking about.
I'm not being a jerk here. I'm honestly asking you what the split is you are talking about when you say "far more powerful cities." Compared to what (far less powerful cities, flyover only, whatever)?MilSpecs wrote: ↑Wed Oct 10, 2018 10:59 amYou wanted a split. In a split, the conservatives would be left with less than the liberals.
Meh - In the SCOTUS thread, I made a point about how ironic it is that the left didn't believe Clinton's accusers but now, all of a sudden, Ford is to be believed. You then called it ironic that I would bring up Clinton, since that's what they were doing to Kavanaugh.
I disagree...……………. but I won't get into the debate here, I'll take it up elsewhere...………… this is your thread. I'm not going to infringe on that.Kath wrote: ↑Wed Oct 10, 2018 11:08 amMeh - In the SCOTUS thread, I made a point about how ironic it is that the left didn't believe Clinton's accusers but now, all of a sudden, Ford is to be believed. You then called it ironic that I would bring up Clinton, since that's what they were doing to Kavanaugh.
So, you assumed my position and argued against me, rather than seeing what was right in front of you, that I was calling out the hypocrisy you said I failed to call out.
You've changed.
Poor Carlus; 2 "Hail Marys" and a "She Broke Me" for that.