Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 18667
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
I, for 1, am predicting a Red Wave. You can say “I told you so,” afterwards if you want, but also be willing to say, “you were right.”
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
It's funny all the libs come out of the woodwork when they are losing. At least ooky and Penner are opportunist.Martin Hash wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:17 amDid you just call someone a name out of the blue? WTF, man, post something real.
-
- Posts: 18667
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
When I say “loser,” I mean it with a Capital-L; people who have lost in The Patriarchy.
p.s. The Patriarchy = liberty, meritocracy & Nationalism
p.p.s. The Matriarchy = Collectivism, Equality & Globalism
p.s. The Patriarchy = liberty, meritocracy & Nationalism
p.p.s. The Matriarchy = Collectivism, Equality & Globalism
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:00 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
No relevance, just funny.
Thy praise or dispraise is to me alike:
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson
-
- Posts: 18667
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
You guys never give Kath enough credit; she has a lot more headwind to overcome to debate with us. Ooky & Penner (MilSpecs too) never budge our way.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Nah they exist. They have huge community forums talking about Chads and Stacys and whatnot. I checked them out after the Van in Toronto. It was disturbing shit. Go ahead and check it out yourself. I haven't browsed their forums since that day but I assume not much has changed. I developed my opinion before the MSM could shape it for me, but in this case they weren't far off. Those dudes are crazy.clubgop wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:32 amIncel is the new boogeyman, these people dont exist. Why does AN know so much about these people if he isnt one? I am convinced incel is like terrorists group taken down by federal agencies. The leadership is undercover feds, membership is undercover local police, and the "true believers" are 1 or 2 individuals with an IQ below 80.
It makes sense to me that men constantly rejected by women, with full balls and no outlets for it besides rubber devices they buy online, would start to get frustrated and take that frustration out on the women who reject them.
I do assume their community has some undercover fake members though, especially after Toronto.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Good to see you never analyze in complete sentences, have you seen the Senate map? It was a hard ask even under a blue wave circumstance, now, forget about it. Heidi Heidtcamp is down by 12% in ND before voting against Kavanaugh. Nelson, Tester, Donnelly in dead hearts before voting against Kavanaugh. McCaskill was within the MoE before voting against Kavanaugh. Your 3rd grade political analyst is noted, a typical trait of an undercover hack.TheAmericanNomad wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:36 amOh look at you clubgop. You are all grown up! You even write in complete sentences now, I am so proud of you. Good to see you, friend.clubgop wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:20 amDo you have any polling to cite for this assertion? Democrats had all the momentum and energy before this and as usual overplayed their hand now it's all but gone. And save it with the "I wont be", for those that don't remember or werent around AmericanNomad is one the original DCF undercover hack bitches.But now that the republicans have ramrodded Kavanaugh in, the democrats will probably win both houses. I won't be voting for them, but people will.
I was never a DNC supporter, even when I was at the DCF. Since I left, I only became more dissatisfied with them. I didn't vote for them even back then because I didn't buy into the whole "lesser of two evils" but I did, in my mind, root for them to win. That was simply because I did think of them as the lesser of two evils, even if I refused to vote for evil (lesser or otherwise).
Since that time, I have come to the conclusion that they are in many ways worse than the GOP. Simply because they pretend to be for peace and equality and whatnot, but they are really warmongers who fight against progressive movements while pretending to champion them. They are like the second Matrix movie: Controlled opposition. And nothing will get better until the party is crushed against the rocks. The fact that they are pushing Debbie Wasserman Schultz after she rigged the primary for Shillary shows how they really feel about progressive movements.
As for my assertion that the Democrats will win in November, I'm sure there are polls supporting my position, but as we both know, polls don't mean shit. The 2016 election proved that much. It is just more that I think the people who ultimately lost (pro-choice democrats) are likely to be stay pissed than the people who ultimately won (pro-life republicans). I could be wrong, of course. The Republicans are typically better at midterms, but the party not in control of the white house also typically does better during midterms. So we will just have to wait and see.
Not that it really matters all that much. Kavanaugh is confirmed and the pipedream of impeachment is a joke. And the Democrats don't push any policies of substance that the Republicans don't, so the election won't really matter unless the hope is for Trump to be impeached, but that will also come back to bite the democrats in the ass when it fails.
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
But what constitutes success in either system?Martin Hash wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:39 amWhen I say “loser,” I mean it with a Capital-L; people who have lost in The Patriarchy.
p.s. The Patriarchy = liberty, meritocracy & Nationalism
p.p.s. The Matriarchy = Collectivism, Equality & Globalism
If you are poor but have a great family and enjoy your job and have warm friends, is that not a success? If you are rich but your wife is cheating on you, your son hates you, you hate your boss and you have no friends, are you still a success?
What I am saying is that there are many measures of success, in any system. And being able to find someone to share your life with you, or at least enjoy your company, is at least as good of a measure as your bank account and arguably better. Meritocracy or no meritocracy.
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
DNC is openly marxist now - large corporations support them because 1) they want to move towards centralized totalitarian government so tbey can be “government sanctioned” provider of goods/service; and 2) they think most proles will buy their good/wares if they are seen as “carring” and “progressive”.TheAmericanNomad wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:36 amclubgop wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:20 amDo you have any polling to cite for this assertion? Democrats had all the momentum and energy before this and as usual overplayed their hand now it's all but gone. And save it with the "I wont be", for those that don't remember or werent around AmericanNomad is one the original DCF undercover hack bitches.But now that the republicans have ramrodded Kavanaugh in, the democrats will probably win both houses. I won't be voting for them, but people will.
Oh look at you clubgop. You are all grown up! You even write in complete sentences now, I am so proud of you. Good to see you, friend.
I was never a DNC supporter, even when I was at the DCF. Since I left, I only became more dissatisfied with them. I didn't vote for them even back then because I didn't buy into the whole "lesser of two evils" but I did, in my mind, root for them to win. That was simply because I did think of them as the lesser of two evils, even if I refused to vote for evil (lesser or otherwise).
Since that time, I have come to the conclusion that they are in many ways worse than the GOP. Simply because they pretend to be for peace and equality and whatnot, but they are really warmongers who fight against progressive movements while pretending to champion them. They are like the second Matrix movie: Controlled opposition. And nothing will get better until the party is crushed against the rocks. The fact that they are pushing Debbie Wasserman Schultz after she rigged the primary for Shillary shows how they really feel about progressive movements.
As for my assertion that the Democrats will win in November, I'm sure there are polls supporting my position, but as we both know, polls don't mean shit. The 2016 election proved that much. It is just more that I think the people who ultimately lost (pro-choice democrats) are likely to be stay pissed than the people who ultimately won (pro-life republicans). I could be wrong, of course. The Republicans are typically better at midterms, but the party not in control of the white house also typically does better during midterms. So we will just have to wait and see.
Not that it really matters all that much. Kavanaugh is confirmed and the pipedream of impeachment is a joke. And the Democrats don't push any policies of substance that the Republicans don't, so the election won't really matter unless the hope is for Trump to be impeached, but that will also come back to bite the democrats in the ass when it fails.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Typical millennial, "I saw it on the internet so it must true and on the up and up. They drain their balls all over the computer screen and willing dupes like you dutifully lick it up. It's the ultimate troll move.TheAmericanNomad wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:44 amNah they exist. They have huge community forums talking about Chads and Stacys and whatnot. I checked them out after the Van in Toronto. It was disturbing shit. Go ahead and check it out yourself. I haven't browsed their forums since that day but I assume not much has changed. I developed my opinion before the MSM could shape it for me, but in this case they weren't far off. Those dudes are crazy.clubgop wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:32 amIncel is the new boogeyman, these people dont exist. Why does AN know so much about these people if he isnt one? I am convinced incel is like terrorists group taken down by federal agencies. The leadership is undercover feds, membership is undercover local police, and the "true believers" are 1 or 2 individuals with an IQ below 80.
It makes sense to me that men constantly rejected by women, with full balls and no outlets for it besides rubber devices they buy online, would start to get frustrated and take that frustration out on the women who reject them.
I do assume their community has some undercover fake members though, especially after Toronto.