Unless she was told to keep on getting them she needed to give one out?clubgop wrote: ↑Sat Sep 29, 2018 5:02 pmThat was Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee, she takes payouts she doesn't give them.The Conservative wrote: ↑Sat Sep 29, 2018 8:49 amReally? Then explain this...Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sat Sep 29, 2018 7:54 amIf brains were made of gunpowder you wouldn't have enough to blow your nose...
Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 14775
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Not in a committee hearing room with cameras. It might be another "victim" not credible.The Conservative wrote: ↑Sat Sep 29, 2018 5:35 pmUnless she was told to keep on getting them she needed to give one out?
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
She was probably passing along a cheat sheet.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
For what? A video game?
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
For the SAT questions
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Took a media blackout day yesterday. Glossed over the last few pages and noticed some discussion of Kavanaugh's definitions for some of the yearbook terms the Dems are so fixated on.
The hypocrisy does not go unnoticed that since the Dems have nothing to go on with the actual accusation, they must attack his character using yearbook entries from high school. Meanwhile, they automatically accept the credibility of 3 accusers, none of which can supply a witness or any other evidence. Accusers who have already lied and whose lies have been exposed.
I wanted to address the terms Boof and Devil's Triangle. Boof never meant farting. I was pretty young in 1982, but that is not what the term meant from what I recall. It was a reference to taking it in the a$$. "Adjusting" his definition makes him less credible. Little lies like this are foolish. We have Google and millions of people who were around in the 80s that know what it means. Admitting you wrote that in your yearbook doesn't make you any more guilty of sexual assault. Teens wrote all kinds of stupid, sexual stuff in yearbooks and never even got past 2nd base until years later. I never heard of Devil's triangle, but I doubt it was a game of quarters. Otherwise it would be called quarters. We never had different names for it based on how many cups there were. Another stupid attempt to clean up something that didn't need to be cleaned.
Just entrenches my opinion that all of these people involved have a thick layer of scum on them.
The hypocrisy does not go unnoticed that since the Dems have nothing to go on with the actual accusation, they must attack his character using yearbook entries from high school. Meanwhile, they automatically accept the credibility of 3 accusers, none of which can supply a witness or any other evidence. Accusers who have already lied and whose lies have been exposed.
I wanted to address the terms Boof and Devil's Triangle. Boof never meant farting. I was pretty young in 1982, but that is not what the term meant from what I recall. It was a reference to taking it in the a$$. "Adjusting" his definition makes him less credible. Little lies like this are foolish. We have Google and millions of people who were around in the 80s that know what it means. Admitting you wrote that in your yearbook doesn't make you any more guilty of sexual assault. Teens wrote all kinds of stupid, sexual stuff in yearbooks and never even got past 2nd base until years later. I never heard of Devil's triangle, but I doubt it was a game of quarters. Otherwise it would be called quarters. We never had different names for it based on how many cups there were. Another stupid attempt to clean up something that didn't need to be cleaned.
Just entrenches my opinion that all of these people involved have a thick layer of scum on them.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
The only thing these people proved is that we need to destroy the democratic party before that evil becomes the default. Kavenaugh is a swamp creature and not particularly endearing, but what they did to him was so thoroughly disgusting and vile that I cannot imagine a decent human being ever voting for them again.
-
- Posts: 18716
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Nothing quite like a one party state to guarantee your liberty.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
There is no way our governmental system could sustain a single party. Destroying the democrats does not mean one party state. It just means destroying that criminal organization for good and allowing the left to start over with something less evil.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 30, 2018 6:34 amNothing quite like a one party state to guarantee your liberty.