Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
i don't blame him for being a little unmeasured but i think he should reel it in a bit
-
- Posts: 2826
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:33 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
I agree, these folks would hang themselves if he let them.pineapplemike wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:05 pmi don't blame him for being a little unmeasured but i think he should reel it in a bit
“I've got a phone that allows me to convene Americans from every walk of life, nonprofits, businesses, the private sector, universities to try to bring more and more Americans together around what I think is a unifying theme..." - Obama
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
You are also a bitch that wants to punish people based on pugs mocking nazis. So your limey flaggot ass means nothing. The FBI does not do what you think it does, and your stupid ass isn't going to convince anyone of the facts.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:54 pmHe's really not doing well under questioning. Avoiding answering direct questions, refusing to sumbit himself to an FBI investigation and talking about unrelated activities when asked about his yearbook statement.
He's losing this.
Looking like a creep.
From the gift that keeps on giving, Joe Biden.
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
you know Trump is watching this, rolling his eyes every time Kavanaugh mentions beer and appeals to the congressmen for how much they themselves drink and "hey who doesn't drink a little?" and "i like beer!" etc etc etc
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
jesus another 15 minute break? what are there commercials or ads or something i'm missing here
-
- Posts: 18716
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
He rambled on about being top of his class, his sporting achievements etc and refused to answer the question.
Classic avoidance tactics.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
He gave an intern a pearl necklace. So what? The real offense is his chubby fetish.kybkh wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:04 pmThere is not a person on this board that would support a candidate who left DNA on an interns dress. If FACTS were bought forth to prove anyone guilty of a crime, Conservatives would have no problem discarding the candidate.Kath wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:56 pmI don't like this guy, but it's Trump's choice. Instead of a he said/she said issue, we have a he cried/she cried issue.
Oy - what a hot mess. Our system is such a joke, now.
On my other forum, it's like this:
I don't care about this, remember Clinton's sexual accusers?
I don't care about Clinton, that was the past. I care about this.
Sexual allegations against team blue are immediately discarded by team blue, while the red team is outraged.
Sexual allegations against team red are immediately discarded by team red, while the blue team is outraged.
This is all I need to know - nobody actually cares about sexual assault charges, true or not, it's all about which team the charge is against. I'm so sick of it.
Hell, look at Roy Moore. In the reddest of states he was discarded on mere allegations.
What is happening here is quite obvious. The Democrat senators made it clear by sitting on the accusations until after his hearing ended.
That fact alone proves the motives of the Left are in absolute bad faith.
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
damn all these media questions "why doesn't he want a full and proper FBI investigation into these alleged incidencts????????" it's because he wants to be on the supreme court you fuckin dorks and he knows it's now or never so go go go full speed ahead
-
- Posts: 18716
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Do you want to gas the Jews?clubgop wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:11 pmYou are also a bitch that wants to punish people based on pugs mocking nazis. So your limey flaggot ass means nothing. The FBI does not do what you think it does, and your stupid ass isn't going to convince anyone of the facts.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:54 pmHe's really not doing well under questioning. Avoiding answering direct questions, refusing to sumbit himself to an FBI investigation and talking about unrelated activities when asked about his yearbook statement.
He's losing this.
Looking like a creep.
From the gift that keeps on giving, Joe Biden.
Do you want to gas the Jews?
Do you want to gas the Jews?
Do you want to gas the Jews?
Do you want to gas the Jews?
Do you want to gas the Jews?
Do you want to gas the Jews?
Do you want to gas the Jews?
Do you want to gas the Jews?
Do you want to gas the Jews?
Do you want to gas the Jews?
Do you want to gas the Jews?
Do you want to gas the Jews?
Can't be arsed to repeat it 30 times but you get the point.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.