Trump's SCOTUS

[TheReal_ND]

WHEN I WAS A LITTLE BOY SOMEONE TOUCHED ME. SOMEBODY RAPED ME.

[TheReal_ND]

NONE OF THESE THINGS HAPPENED

MY CLIENT IS 100%

I CAN DO 30 CHINUPS IN A ROW

WHEN IM NOT PAYING ATTENTION, MY DOG ADVISES LENINS GHOST

[TheReal_ND]

THEY CUT MY PENIS AND THEN FONDLED ME IN THE REAR BUT. I WAS ACTUALLY RAPED AND NOONE CARES. WHY???

[C-Mag]

Savage

That was pretty awesome

[PartyOf5]

The virgin defense is weak. Being a virgin doesn't make him any less believable or the accusations any less credible. Not sure why they are even going with that at all. Then again, it's hard to defend against and find witnesses for an accusation that has no specific date or location.

[Speaker to Animals]

He should not defend himself directly. He should expose the accusers as liars.

Men targeted in this way are victims of a crime far worse than the rape their accusers lied about experiencing.

There is nothing for him to defend. These allegations are totally baseless. They obviously are lying, which is why I do not expect them to testify under oath. I hope they testify, though, because I suspect this time these rape hoaxers will go to prison.

These bigot leftist women burned out any goodwill they have left. I think we passed the zenith of their ability to destroy men with impunity.

[clubgop]

He should not defend himself directly. He should expose the accusers as liars.

Men targeted in this way are victims of a crime far worse than the rape their accusers lied about experiencing.

There is nothing for him to defend. These allegations are totally baseless. They obviously are lying, which is why I do not expect them to testify under oath. I hope they testify, though, because I suspect this time these rape hoaxers will go to prison.

These bigot leftist women burned out any goodwill they have left. I think we passed the zenith of their ability to destroy men with impunity.

You are delusional. There is and can be no proof that she is lying. We have an unspecified time and unspecified place. That same burden of proof you want him to have, I do as well, she gets when you accuse her of perjury. Besides no one goes to jail for perjury during a congressional hearing. Just forget her, she was given a forum, she won't show, that should tell you all you need to know.

[Martin Hash]

He should not defend himself directly. He should expose the accusers as liars.

Men targeted in this way are victims of a crime far worse than the rape their accusers lied about experiencing.

There is nothing for him to defend. These allegations are totally baseless. They obviously are lying, which is why I do not expect them to testify under oath. I hope they testify, though, because I suspect this time these rape hoaxers will go to prison.

These bigot leftist women burned out any goodwill they have left. I think we passed the zenith of their ability to destroy men with impunity.

You are delusional. There is and can be no proof that she is lying. We have an unspecified time and unspecified place. That same burden of proof you want him to have, I do as well, she gets when you accuse her of perjury. Besides no one goes to jail for perjury during a congressional hearing. Just forget her, she was given a forum, she won't show, that should tell you all you need to know.

Agree

[Speaker to Animals]

He should not defend himself directly. He should expose the accusers as liars.

Men targeted in this way are victims of a crime far worse than the rape their accusers lied about experiencing.

There is nothing for him to defend. These allegations are totally baseless. They obviously are lying, which is why I do not expect them to testify under oath. I hope they testify, though, because I suspect this time these rape hoaxers will go to prison.

These bigot leftist women burned out any goodwill they have left. I think we passed the zenith of their ability to destroy men with impunity.

You are delusional. There is and can be no proof that she is lying. We have an unspecified time and unspecified place. That same burden of proof you want him to have, I do as well, she gets when you accuse her of perjury. Besides no one goes to jail for perjury during a congressional hearing. Just forget her, she was given a forum, she won't show, that should tell you all you need to know.

Bullshit.

You can prove she lied because you can prove her accusations contradict themselves, and you can also prove that no such party even took place. All the witnesses she named have denied there was ever such a party. There was only one woman whom she did not name who publicly stated that it happened, and stated people talked about it for weeks at school, but then when you look at the initial allegation, Ford said it happened over the summer, so there was nobody in school at the time. That women retracted her allegation and went dark. All the witnesses Ford named denied it happened.

The whole thing is a farce and easily disproven. It is not delusional to hold these women accountable for lying no differently than we do in ever other context. When you lie to law enforcement or prosecutors, or lie under oath, you are supposed to go to jail. Martha Stewart got locked up for a lie that literally harmed nobody.

They lock people up just because witnesses contradict them. If you tell law enforcement one thing, and law enforcement finds a witness to contradict it, they can and sometimes do go after you and try to lock you up for lying to them.

Women should not get a free pass for this shit.

[C-Mag]

I told you fuckers they should have subpoenaed this accusers. That's the only way you get any real resolution, is both parties have to show up and testify.