You are now pre-judging him as innocent because it suits your political position.
Another leftist enraged by that whole “presumption of innocence” thing. How dare we assume innocence when a completely unfounded claim has been leveled.
Clearly this is white supremacy at work.
Under the Montegriffo utopia you’re a damn sex offender when someone says you are. Uh ... unless you say Monte is one, in which case it’s slander. We call it a myopia utopia. Or just “retarded self indulgence” if you’re not into the whole brevity thing.
As opposed to the values that allow sex offenders to label others sex offenders ... with nary a criminal conviction, police report, nor even a witness to a crime in sight.
Very compelling.
You certainly sound like you have the moral high ground.
Allegations have been made. Do you think that they should not be investigated further before this possible sex offender is given a seat on the SC?
If the women are proved to be lying then I will be alongside StA in calling for them to be charged and prosecuted for making false statements. If they are shown to be credible then this man has no place on the SC.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Postby Speaker to Animals » Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:07 am
Seriously ponder this question:
If you were forced to choose between two shitty options, which would you choose..
(1) Being falsely accused of rape and getting your life utterly destroyed and possibly imprisoned for many years.
(2) Being raped yourself.
These leftists want a world where any man can be destroyed by option (1) with impunity to the false accusers all because they claim rape is so horrible we need to drop the presumption of innocence.
Except any reasonable man would choose (2). Why the fuck would we want to foist option (1) on the world when we all damned well know we'd rather the raped ourselves than be the victims of these false accusers.
Rape is so bad for women we have to subject men to an injustice even worse than rape??
Get the fuck out of my face with that injustice. Fuck yourself.
So now an anonymous accusation on a little forum is the same as testifying before a Senate committee?
Who testified before the senate? Nobody. Yet here you are declaring a man a sex offender based off accusations alone.
If anyone wants to make a public accusation about me using their real name then go ahead, I will be glad to take you to court for slander and sue you for every penny you have.
That bit of cowardice certainly explains why you choose to slander others behind a screen name. I guess you’re safe from Kavanaugh suing you for calling him a sex offender as long as you keep your identity well hidden. Are there any standards you actually hold yourself to?
Look, I have already admitted that I should have said alleged sex offender. Time to drop this line of attack and state whether you believe that the allegations should be investigated further or just dismissed out of hand because it doesn't suit your political agenda.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Already answered.
If there’s no crime to prosecute, there’s no justification for funding an investigation.
Derp.
Amazing how your personal convictions flip so easily once you realize that under your own regime, you’re a sex offender. Most people might take a moment to reflect when faced with that, but you just plow forward without letting it slow you down a bit.
Remarkable.
Sure, the timing is suspect but maybe the women in question were prepared to forget it when it was just some college boy but felt that they couldn't remain silent when this man is being lined up for a seat on the highest court in the land.
None of us know the truth of these allegations yet but it would be some willful blindness to just call it politically motivated without first examining the accusations.
Diane Feinstein and other Democrats knew of the initial accusation in July. There is no doubt their timing was deliberate in order to maximize the chance this would derail the nomination. The accusers have a "little" forgiveness with their timing, but the Dems who knew about the first accusation and sat on it have ZERO forgiveness. They did this for no other reason than politics.
A week ago I was ready to chunk Kavanaugh over the side to teach Trump a lesson. It's a lesson I hope he's learned for next time around, when Ruth Buzzi Ginsburg (or one of the others) shuffles off the mortal coil.
Current day, it seems to me Chuck needs to decide if we are playing bowling or playing Nam.
Trump's base were not prepared to change their opinion of him after the tape of him admitting to groping women became public so it is a small step from there for them to ignore the allegations in this case.
That's republican family values for you right there.
The Clintons already set the precedent that those kinds of actions were acceptable for a POTUS.
Do you want a situation where women are too frightened to make accusations for fear of being labelled as liars and whores if they dare speak out about being assaulted?
