Trump's SCOTUS

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Sep 24, 2018 5:17 am

Zlaxer wrote:
Mon Sep 24, 2018 5:14 am
Speaker to Animals wrote:
Mon Sep 24, 2018 5:13 am
I think you should consider the possibility that the female deficit in sympathy cuts both ways.

No - because "abortion is a right".
:lol:

Dude, they are playing that game to split the male vote. Women are already a split vote. That shit only motivates degenerate women (mostly democrats). Half of women want to criminalize abortion for all but extreme cases.

Women in general lack sympathy. I don't even think the women on the left for the most part give a shit about these accusers. They are just using them as political tools and they fucking know it. They are doing it to convince enough men to vote democrat (or not vote) so they can split our vote.

But the explicit hatred for men completely undermines this. It's over.

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by DBTrek » Mon Sep 24, 2018 6:59 am

Still waiting for the first non-drunk accuser who can remember facts that others will corroborate.

How many drunk women with hazy memories and “memory gaps” can the DNC produce? Do they have a stable of them they keep for emergencies like this?
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18667
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Martin Hash » Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:04 am

DBTrek wrote:
Mon Sep 24, 2018 6:59 am
Still waiting for the first non-drunk accuser who can remember facts that others will corroborate.

How many drunk women with hazy memories and “memory gaps” can the DNC produce? Do they have a stable of them they keep for emergencies like this?
Yes. What's to stop them?

In the normal course of events, without the ulterior motives of anti-abortion Republicans to surrepitously boink Kavanaugh, they would have ignored the first accusation and had a vote. Kvanaugh would have been confirmed and Dems wouldn't try the tactic again. But this is politics; all you have to do is read StA's tirade on the issue to see why it didn't go like that. This is a lynching by both Parties.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by TheReal_ND » Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:05 am

Image

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:15 am

If you're for killing unborn babies, stop pretending like you are MAGA.

That is the opposite. It's fucking our entire economy and demographics to Hell.

Degeneracy has to stop.

PartyOf5
Posts: 3657
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by PartyOf5 » Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:21 am

Ph64 wrote:
Sun Sep 23, 2018 8:53 pm
2nd accuser... "I wasn't going to touch a penis until I was married".

Oh PUHLEEZ. Yeah, and you were going to frat parties playing drinking games.
Sorry, been to college and frat parties, that never happened - that's like looking for dry people in the swimming pool... At least not unless she was 300lbs and fugly.

Oh yeah, and she was "raised Catholic in CT" - yeah, and I graduated from a Catholic high school in CT and I'm pretty sure only a tiny percentage of female students were still virgins by graduation.
I now really want some men to come forward with their true stories of having sex with her in college. I'm not buying that she never touched a penis until she was married. If one side can bring out accusations, I want the accusers to be held accountable for their statements. If this incident really did happen, there should be no problem finding a couple of people who witnessed it. It was at a party in front of others.

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18667
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Martin Hash » Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:26 am

Don't get sucked down the Rabbit Hole, of course none of this stuff ever happened.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Zlaxer » Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:27 am

Martin Hash wrote:
Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:26 am
Don't get sucked down the Rabbit Hole, of course none of this stuff ever happened.
Good - then all we have to do is wait for justice and fairness to prevail as the DNC implodes :roll:

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:29 am

PartyOf5 wrote:
Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:21 am
Ph64 wrote:
Sun Sep 23, 2018 8:53 pm
2nd accuser... "I wasn't going to touch a penis until I was married".

Oh PUHLEEZ. Yeah, and you were going to frat parties playing drinking games.
Sorry, been to college and frat parties, that never happened - that's like looking for dry people in the swimming pool... At least not unless she was 300lbs and fugly.

Oh yeah, and she was "raised Catholic in CT" - yeah, and I graduated from a Catholic high school in CT and I'm pretty sure only a tiny percentage of female students were still virgins by graduation.
I now really want some men to come forward with their true stories of having sex with her in college. I'm not buying that she never touched a penis until she was married. If one side can bring out accusations, I want the accusers to be held accountable for their statements. If this incident really did happen, there should be no problem finding a couple of people who witnessed it. It was at a party in front of others.
That would actually be pretty funny. But she is rather unattractive. Everybody is afraid to say it openly, but I doubt young Kavennaugh was that desperate.

User avatar
pineapplemike
Posts: 4650
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by pineapplemike » Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:46 am

anyone else here that would not be at all surprised to find a 17/18/19/whatever year old brett kavanaugh was indeed responsible for the accused acts? anyone else here that would also be ok with him still sitting on the supreme court after that fact? besides me

4th amendment issues aside