Economics: Muh Roadz

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Economics: Muh Roadz

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Sep 22, 2018 6:36 am

Fife wrote:
Sat Sep 22, 2018 5:59 am
Who currently "controls the core infrastructure of civilization, making life and death decisions for its economy," and how are those people held accountable for their decisions?
The government is responsible either for maintenance or the regulation thereof.

They are held accountable by elections.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Economics: Muh Roadz

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Sep 22, 2018 6:37 am

Now you. Answer the fucking question.

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Economics: Muh Roadz

Post by Fife » Sat Sep 22, 2018 6:45 am

Who is the "government?" The "government" injured you through the maintenance of "its" road? If you expect accountability for that injury, just vote a little harder next time, I guess. :goteam: :drunk:

What fucking question are you wanting me to answer anyway? The one about showing you a paved road not owned by a state? Grow up, kid, get relevant.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Economics: Muh Roadz

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Sep 22, 2018 7:03 am

Answer the question.

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Economics: Muh Roadz

Post by Fife » Sat Sep 22, 2018 7:10 am

Let's engage your fallacy, disingenuous as it is.

http://bfy.tw/K0q3

My position is that the state is not a pre-req for a roadway. Good luck attacking that idea. Empirical evidence is not needed to support the proposition, although that evidence is all around us.

If anyone is interested in further reading about the demented supplication to the state the lo-infos suffer from: https://www.amazon.com/Problem-Politica ... 137281650/

It really is hard not to feel sorry for them.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Economics: Muh Roadz

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Sep 22, 2018 7:14 am

Just answer the fucking question, genius.

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Economics: Muh Roadz

Post by Fife » Sat Sep 22, 2018 7:26 am

I guess you're going to have to ask it it again, Sister. I don't know wtf you're talking about.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Economics: Muh Roadz

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Sep 22, 2018 8:03 am

You won't answer it because you God damned well know that for all of five thousand years of human civilization it never happened. Weird how something so obvious and easy never happened before.
Last edited by Speaker to Animals on Sat Sep 22, 2018 8:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18721
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Economics: Muh Roadz

Post by Martin Hash » Sat Sep 22, 2018 8:06 am

Fife, are you an Anarcho-Capitalist?

Anarcho-capitalism is a political philosophy that advocates the elimination of the state in favor of individual sovereignty, private property, and open markets. Anarcho-capitalists believe that in the absence of statute (law by decree or legislation), society would improve itself through the discipline of the free market (or what its proponents describe as a "voluntary society").
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Economics: Muh Roadz

Post by Fife » Sat Sep 22, 2018 3:18 pm

Martin Hash wrote:
Sat Sep 22, 2018 8:06 am
Fife, are you an Anarcho-Capitalist?

Anarcho-capitalism is a political philosophy that advocates the elimination of the state in favor of individual sovereignty, private property, and open markets. Anarcho-capitalists believe that in the absence of statute (law by decree or legislation), society would improve itself through the discipline of the free market (or what its proponents describe as a "voluntary society").
I reject being catalogued by internet definitions. I do abhor coercion and non-defensive violence.

I think Mises is pretty spectacular, and a few others.

I'll answer any question honestly. I don't want any third party labels, though.