Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
I am thinking about the fact that this guy is going to fuck us right in the ass just like John Roberts.
Why defend this shit? They could have nominated and confirmed pretty much anybody right now. This guy is not going to do you any favors. Just because it's going to be harder to confirm an actually good judge after the midterms you want to fuck us all over for the next thirty years?
Why defend this shit? They could have nominated and confirmed pretty much anybody right now. This guy is not going to do you any favors. Just because it's going to be harder to confirm an actually good judge after the midterms you want to fuck us all over for the next thirty years?
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Trump lost this fight the minute he capitulated to the Swamp.
No redemption now before election day.
Fucking loser.
No redemption now before election day.
Fucking loser.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Turn the dial right. On the Anthony Kennedy scale this guy is slightly to the right of that. Take the win.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:41 amExhibit A: John Roberts.
John Roberts was selected by the republicans. He proceeded to defend Obamacare and fuck Americans straight in the fucking collective asshole within only a few years.
There is no defending people like this. Why even try to defend this?
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
The very moment everybody not on team pozz realizes that this is a fucking war is the moment we start to turn all this shit around.
The democrats are not going to nominate judges that are compromises or swing votes. They will nominate political actors like Sotomayor. Then these same republicans who gave us Kavenaugh will try to be polite and just confirm Sotomayor 2.0, just like last time, and the time before that. Meanwhile, every time some abomination like Obamacare comes before the court, guess what Kavenaugh and Sotomayor 2.0 are going to vote to support..
Because if we withdraw this nomination now it's going to be harder to nominate the next guy after the midterms. Great.
The democrats are not going to nominate judges that are compromises or swing votes. They will nominate political actors like Sotomayor. Then these same republicans who gave us Kavenaugh will try to be polite and just confirm Sotomayor 2.0, just like last time, and the time before that. Meanwhile, every time some abomination like Obamacare comes before the court, guess what Kavenaugh and Sotomayor 2.0 are going to vote to support..
Because if we withdraw this nomination now it's going to be harder to nominate the next guy after the midterms. Great.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
We are here talking about the kinds of people who with straight faces can argue they invented natural rights nowhere enumerated in the US Constitution out of whole cloth, and then scratch their heads in bewilderment at the notion that the very explicit rights outlined in the Bill of Rights exist, arguing that they are vague and do not mean what they say they mean.
Maybe let's not have more people like that on the Supreme Court. Thanks.
Maybe let's not have more people like that on the Supreme Court. Thanks.
-
- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:10 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Kavanaugh is not my man.
Do not withdraw the nomination.
Do not withdraw the nomination.
-
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:14 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Agreed. One more swamp critter won't make much difference. I hope he chooses better next time.
Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?
-
- Posts: 5297
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
- Location: suiþiuþu
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Welcome back! You just missed civil week.
An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna
Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck
-
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:14 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Thank you - it's a trial period.
Civil week? Lol... did it work? I am back with a promise to myself that the moment I become uncivil, I will leave. I have no room for drama in my life, especially the negative type. I can turn on the tv if I want to see drama.
Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?
-
- Posts: 5297
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
- Location: suiþiuþu
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
It was an initiative by StA. He said he needs to cut back on toxicity in his life.
https://www.martinhash.com/forums/viewt ... =64&t=3881
I thought I noticed a big change in tone.
An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna
Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck