Montegriffo wrote: Thu Sep 13, 2018 1:20 pm
Sounds fair. Bangladesh and the Seychelles need to act to mitigate the effects of 150 years of CO2 output from the worlds industrial nations.
As long as children of Bangledesh keep going to work so they can keep the urbanites in trendy fashions were good.
Sounds reasonable. Bangladesh and the Seychelles need to act to mitigate the effects of 150 years of CO2 output from the worlds industrial nations.
Better?
If not I have other similes such as ''just'', ''acceptable'' or ''balanced''
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Atmospheric CO2 levels have risen 30 percent in the last 150 years, with half of that rise occurring only in the last three decades. It is a well-established scientific fact that CO2 (and other gases emitted from industrial and agricultural sources) traps heat in the atmosphere, so it is no surprise that we are now witnessing a dramatic increase in temperature.
Human population on the planet has probably at least quintupled in the past 150 years, largely due to the advances from those industrial and agricultural sources.
How many people do we need to eliminate from the population to correct the CO2 problem? Are you volunteering?
The climate is far less stable than the gw cultists lead you to believe. Go study the Paleolithic (seriously). Humans saw in about twenty years a cold snap so harsh the glaciers advanced back south within a single lifetime, causing our light skinned ancestors to migrate south.
When they show you charts, they play a lot of shitty games, like drastically limit the range, or changing the dataset in earlier periods toake it look more stable than it really is.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
SuburbanFarmer wrote: Thu Sep 13, 2018 2:36 pm
It’s not correctable - at least not through any normal means available.
Carbon capture is a possible way to do it but nobody wants to spend the money.
Most prefer to just stick their head in the sand.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
