The commerce clause is pretty sufficient for most of it.
Fife you got a draft in 15 mins. Get there.
The commerce clause is pretty sufficient for most of it.
Not mine, Wikipedia's.
"in pursuance thereof"DBTrek wrote: ↑Tue Sep 04, 2018 5:17 pmNot mine, Wikipedia's.
But it's the part of the Constitution that states:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
I know you're hungry for a win after the disaster that was your voluntary-contract road utopia farce, but I'm just spit-balling here. Not really invested either way because no matter what folks opine on this forum the DEA will handle your ass if you get crosswise with them.
/shrug
Aw no, that is clearly there in Art 1 sec 8SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 04, 2018 4:53 pmThe same part that allowed Tricky Dick to default on America’s debt, and move to pretend Monopoly money.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Tue Sep 04, 2018 4:48 pmWhere in the Constitution does it say these federal drug laws are okay?