Russia! Russia!! Russia!!!

[Speaker to Animals]

Harry, you never told us what CNN said about their failed attempt to dox the Manafort jurors.

We know you're watching.

CNN is just trying to root out Russian spies in the jury.

[Okeefenokee]

Harry, you never told us what CNN said about their failed attempt to dox the Manafort jurors.

We know you're watching.

CNN is just trying to root out Russian spies in the jury.

Sounds like something you read on Breitbart.

[doc_loliday]

[TheReal_ND]

My uncle works on the Rosenstein investigation. AMA

[HarryK]

Quotes from the “alleged” filings of not only CNN but 6 other news outlets

1) The “Media” respectfully requests that the court grants it’s motion and unseals the records and information it seeks pursuiant to the settled access to the records in criminal cases pursuiant to the 1st amendment and common law.

I). Media coalition that has standing to intervene

Company Doe v Pub Citizen (noting that the 4th circuit “has previously permitted news organizations to intervene in actions in which they were not otherwise parties to challenge a district’s court sealing order.”

Media outlets ‘unquestionably have standing to challenge access to court documents.’

Therefore because of the news media’s right to intervene to request unsealing of judicial records is unquestioned, the Media Coalition should be granted to intervene in this case.

II). Public Rights access to the materials the Media Coalition seeks

Those access rights extend to “documents submitted in the coarse of a trial, “such as transcripts, motions, and other substantive fillings.”

“It is clear that the courts recognize a general right to inspect and copy ... judicial records and documents. That access “may be abrogated in unusual circumstances.”

The party seeking to keep the records sealed (aka Manafort) “bears the burden of showing some significant interests that outweighs the presumption of openness.”

The common law access right applies to all judicial records and may be overcome only if, “the public’s right of access is outweighed by competing interests.


So yeah CNN and the Media Coalition didn’t not “intervene” like you all thought. Maybe ask Fife or De Officis nicely and they will both tell ya that “Legal lingo ain’t not common English spoken by amateurs who forgot the part of the 1st amendment is freedom of the press not matter how vile that source is.)

(Case close you all owe me at least 5 growlers of Dead Guy Ale.)

[TheReal_ND]

We dont have a right to secret jury like in the UK though doxing them would lead easily to a mistrial. This is not the first time this has happened, or as jewdiciaries, like to say, there is a precedence for this. The judge was threatened as well, according to the judge, who is being protected by US Marshals. Basically, CNN, buzzfeed, wapo and co are acting like mobsters right now and it doesn't cause so much as a ruffled feather for some people. Amazing.

[The Conservative]

Quotes from the “alleged” filings of not only CNN but 6 other news outlets

1) The “Media” respectfully requests that the court grants it’s motion and unseals the records and information it seeks pursuiant to the settled access to the records in criminal cases pursuiant to the 1st amendment and common law.

I). Media coalition that has standing to intervene

Company Doe v Pub Citizen (noting that the 4th circuit “has previously permitted news organizations to intervene in actions in which they were not otherwise parties to challenge a district’s court sealing order.”

Media outlets ‘unquestionably have standing to challenge access to court documents.’

Therefore because of the news media’s right to intervene to request unsealing of judicial records is unquestioned, the Media Coalition should be granted to intervene in this case.

II). Public Rights access to the materials the Media Coalition seeks

Those access rights extend to “documents submitted in the coarse of a trial, “such as transcripts, motions, and other substantive fillings.”

“It is clear that the courts recognize a general right to inspect and copy ... judicial records and documents. That access “may be abrogated in unusual circumstances.”

The party seeking to keep the records sealed (aka Manafort) “bears the burden of showing some significant interests that outweighs the presumption of openness.”

The common law access right applies to all judicial records and may be overcome only if, “the public’s right of access is outweighed by competing interests.


So yeah CNN and the Media Coalition didn’t not “intervene” like you all thought. Maybe ask Fife or De Officis nicely and they will both tell ya that “Legal lingo ain’t not common English spoken by amateurs who forgot the part of the 1st amendment is freedom of the press not matter how vile that source is.)

(Case close you all owe me at least 5 growlers of Dead Guy Ale.)

The court has every right to deny while a trial is going on.

[Okeefenokee]

alleged

Because that's what we needed around here. Another fucking cnn watching loon.

[TheReal_ND]

alleged

Because that's what we needed around here. Another fucking cnn watching loon.

anonymous high level sources

Holy shit guys did you here about this?

court documents

Look at these alleged claims. Huh. Big if true.

[HarryK]

Which has always been at the judge’s discretion genius pants. And guess what I can almost bet without looking it was the same “media” that uncovered the Clinton’s “Whitewater” scandal before Kenneth Star knew about it. FOIA is awesome to shed a light on malfeasance whether it’s a D, R, or I next to their name.

But ya know I’m biased.