They were right to ignore that potential, they have a core business, running a social network becomes a full time job no one really wants. Screw that stuff.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sun Aug 19, 2018 10:48 amHonestly, one way Netflix fucked up when they transitioned from a web-based recommender system to a streaming service was in not capturing that space for a social network centered around entertainment.
The Netflix platform in the early to mid-2000s was almost a social network in it's own right, with user profiles, likes, groups, playlists, etc. They needed more forums.
If I were Netflix, I would have tried to buy the Hollywood Exchange, or duplicate that kind of futures market and integrate it into the Netflix platform. The data from that exchange is valuable and easily exploitable for any recommendation system.
The internet takeover thread
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: The internet takeover thread
Last edited by clubgop on Sun Aug 19, 2018 11:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: The internet takeover thread
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: The internet takeover thread
another miscommunication
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 25279
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: The internet takeover thread
Intentionally wearing an opposing gang symbol to a gang rally is pretty much asking for an assault, yes.clubgop wrote: ↑Sun Aug 19, 2018 10:29 amIt does precisely that. You want and wish the government to enforce your words. No, not the Tommy Robinson thing, but I could add that to the list, thanks, if a liberal does it you call it reporting and name him Jim Acosta, because you are a liberal hack bitch, also your equation that wearing a hat is ok and so is an assault for wearing said hat.SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Sun Aug 19, 2018 5:43 amThe thing where that guy was standing outside a courthouse screaming at people and got arrested? Yeah, pretty sure that’s not a first amendment thing.
The hockey talk thing was ridiculous, but surprisingly it wasn’t a government censorship issue.
The First Amendment does not protect you from me telling you to shut the fuck up.
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: The internet takeover thread
Some real hot takes guys
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: The internet takeover thread
You're such a pathetic lying faggot.SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Sun Aug 19, 2018 12:29 pmIntentionally wearing an opposing gang symbol to a gang rally is pretty much asking for an assault, yes.clubgop wrote: ↑Sun Aug 19, 2018 10:29 amIt does precisely that. You want and wish the government to enforce your words. No, not the Tommy Robinson thing, but I could add that to the list, thanks, if a liberal does it you call it reporting and name him Jim Acosta, because you are a liberal hack bitch, also your equation that wearing a hat is ok and so is an assault for wearing said hat.SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Sun Aug 19, 2018 5:43 am
The thing where that guy was standing outside a courthouse screaming at people and got arrested? Yeah, pretty sure that’s not a first amendment thing.
The hockey talk thing was ridiculous, but surprisingly it wasn’t a government censorship issue.
The First Amendment does not protect you from me telling you to shut the fuck up.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 25279
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: The internet takeover thread
Prove me wrong. Go to the south side of Chicago at night, wearing a bright red or blue outfit.Okeefenokee wrote: ↑Sun Aug 19, 2018 1:04 pmYou're such a pathetic lying faggot.SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Sun Aug 19, 2018 12:29 pmIntentionally wearing an opposing gang symbol to a gang rally is pretty much asking for an assault, yes.clubgop wrote: ↑Sun Aug 19, 2018 10:29 am
It does precisely that. You want and wish the government to enforce your words. No, not the Tommy Robinson thing, but I could add that to the list, thanks, if a liberal does it you call it reporting and name him Jim Acosta, because you are a liberal hack bitch, also your equation that wearing a hat is ok and so is an assault for wearing said hat.
Even better, go to some event that’s known to be promoted by one color, and wear the opposite one.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: The internet takeover thread
Former Chicagoan here..SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Sun Aug 19, 2018 1:28 pmProve me wrong. Go to the south side of Chicago at night, wearing a bright red or blue outfit.Okeefenokee wrote: ↑Sun Aug 19, 2018 1:04 pmYou're such a pathetic lying faggot.SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Sun Aug 19, 2018 12:29 pm
Intentionally wearing an opposing gang symbol to a gang rally is pretty much asking for an assault, yes.
Even better, go to some event that’s known to be promoted by one color, and wear the opposite one.
If you did that, you'd get a lot of offers to buy drugs.
White guy coming around is considered potential customer.
-
- Posts: 25279
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: The internet takeover thread
Fair point, but pedantry won’t derail my analogy.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sun Aug 19, 2018 1:36 pmFormer Chicagoan here..SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Sun Aug 19, 2018 1:28 pmProve me wrong. Go to the south side of Chicago at night, wearing a bright red or blue outfit.
Even better, go to some event that’s known to be promoted by one color, and wear the opposite one.
If you did that, you'd get a lot of offers to buy drugs.
White guy coming around is considered potential customer.
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: The internet takeover thread
Wearing Trump gear to a Trump rally is not wearing opposing gang colors on gang turf, you lying idiot.SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Sun Aug 19, 2018 1:38 pmFair point, but pedantry won’t derail my analogy.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sun Aug 19, 2018 1:36 pmFormer Chicagoan here..SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Sun Aug 19, 2018 1:28 pm
Prove me wrong. Go to the south side of Chicago at night, wearing a bright red or blue outfit.
Even better, go to some event that’s known to be promoted by one color, and wear the opposite one.
If you did that, you'd get a lot of offers to buy drugs.
White guy coming around is considered potential customer.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751