Russia! Russia!! Russia!!!

[SuburbanFarmer]

I Dare you to make solid arguments and back it up with references...…………. C'mon Punk, Make my Day !

Meh, did plenty of that in the discussion about Steven Yaxley Lennon. Made no difference what so ever.
My sources are all considered fake news lying media then Gateway pundit and Breitbart are rolled out to make the point.
Opinions without sources to back them up are the way forward... ask StA.

The source for an opinion is the person who holds it.

Sources should be demanded for statements of fact.

Arguments don't necessarily need sources if the propositions are self-evident or logical in nature. Asking for sources to such arguments is also sophomoric. You have to respond to the argument.

I shouldn't have to explain this to you.

Premise 1: "Dan used to shill for Republicans"
Premise 2: "Dan 'flipped' to Democrats"

Given around 1,000 hours of content from him, you should be able to point to something that supports this idea. We're all working from the exact same pool of evidence, give or take some conversations on the old DCF.

[Speaker to Animals]

Meh, did plenty of that in the discussion about Steven Yaxley Lennon. Made no difference what so ever.
My sources are all considered fake news lying media then Gateway pundit and Breitbart are rolled out to make the point.
Opinions without sources to back them up are the way forward... ask StA.

The source for an opinion is the person who holds it.

Sources should be demanded for statements of fact.

Arguments don't necessarily need sources if the propositions are self-evident or logical in nature. Asking for sources to such arguments is also sophomoric. You have to respond to the argument.

I shouldn't have to explain this to you.

Premise 1: "Dan used to shill for Republicans"
Premise 2: "Dan 'flipped' to Democrats"

Given around 1,000 hours of content from him, you should be able to point to something that supports this idea. We're all working from the exact same pool of evidence, give or take some conversations on the old DCF.

Dude, fuck off.

The reason you do this is to try to make opinions statements of facts to somehow cast an opinion as illegitimate rather than just saying "I disagree".

You are a fucking retard.

[Speaker to Animals]

It was my fervent hope that this particular brand of fake intellectualism would have died ignobly as it deserved in the great YouTube Skeptic Collapse of 2015.

But alas, we are still plagued by this particular brand of stupid.

[clubgop]

Right on cue...

Oh, look, they stick together through thick and thin.




You two nonstop troll this forum with insults and bullshit. Don't try to snow the rest of us.

Never give up, one day you may even have a friend of your own.

Yeah, Monty had to cross an ocean on the internet but eventually he found that loser willing to befriend him.

[clubgop]

Or, #DBAP. That works pretty well, also.

Word.

[Okeefenokee]

Hey Harry, what's CNN saying about their attempt to dox the jurors in the Manafort case?

[HarryK]

Hey Harry, what's CNN saying about their attempt to dox the jurors in the Manafort case?

Are you using Breitbart or the Federalist as your “alleged” source?

[Speaker to Animals]

Hey Harry, what's CNN saying about their attempt to dox the jurors in the Manafort case?

Are you using Breitbart or the Federalist as your “alleged” source?

Are you fucking serious?

He's using the published motions by CNN and others to force the jurisdiction to divilge their names and addresses as soon as the jury took too long to deliberate.

[Okeefenokee]

Hey Harry, what's CNN saying about their attempt to dox the jurors in the Manafort case?

Are you using Breitbart or the Federalist as your “alleged” source?

Are you saying it didn't happen, and the Federalist and Breitbart made it up?

[Okeefenokee]

https://assets.documentcloud.org/docume ... Access.pdf