What is a foetus?C-Mag wrote: ↑Tue Aug 07, 2018 2:26 pmI agree. Two-Thirds of black mothers raise kids alone +/-.Okeefenokee wrote: ↑Tue Aug 07, 2018 1:58 pmIt's not a fucking myth. Men take off and abandon their children.
Put down the pipe.
My only issue is that our Justice System says that Males bear the responsibility for Sexual activity from how we look at a women to the child or foetus produced. However, Men do not have the Authority to make decisions over life of a foetus or if the child is born whether or not he wants to support a child.
THE ERA OF TRUMP
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
If Mom does not want dad around, then that's on her. Do not conflate women demanding ever more resources from men with men abandoning children.
For a man to abandon children, he has to have the opportunity to be a father. Women do not provide that opportunity in the vast majority of cases. They just want more resources from men they have no moral right to demand. They cannot admit it, so they talk about it in terms of the children's welfare. But they did not give a shit about their children when they robbed those children of a father. They just want more money and more chances to fuck up.
And when women bitch about so-called deadbeat dads, they are bitching about money, not fatherlessness. It's a fucking con. Always was.
Women are responsible for the blight if fatherlessness in this country. Nobody else except maybe then men who enable women to get away with it and then shuffle responsibility for it onto the fathers. Fuck that and fuck them. This is evil.
For a man to abandon children, he has to have the opportunity to be a father. Women do not provide that opportunity in the vast majority of cases. They just want more resources from men they have no moral right to demand. They cannot admit it, so they talk about it in terms of the children's welfare. But they did not give a shit about their children when they robbed those children of a father. They just want more money and more chances to fuck up.
And when women bitch about so-called deadbeat dads, they are bitching about money, not fatherlessness. It's a fucking con. Always was.
Women are responsible for the blight if fatherlessness in this country. Nobody else except maybe then men who enable women to get away with it and then shuffle responsibility for it onto the fathers. Fuck that and fuck them. This is evil.
Last edited by Speaker to Animals on Tue Aug 07, 2018 3:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
A pearl of wisdom, from our great leader.
Donald J. Trump tweeted “California wildfires are being magnified & made so much worse by the bad environmental laws which aren't allowing massive amount of readily available water to be properly utilized. It is being diverted into the Pacific Ocean. Must also tree clear to stop fire spreading!”
we serve at the pleasure of a 5th grader. Welcome to America.
Donald J. Trump tweeted “California wildfires are being magnified & made so much worse by the bad environmental laws which aren't allowing massive amount of readily available water to be properly utilized. It is being diverted into the Pacific Ocean. Must also tree clear to stop fire spreading!”
we serve at the pleasure of a 5th grader. Welcome to America.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
He is right, though.
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
What environmental law is diverting water to the ocean?
And how much water do you estimate is needed to put out a 300,000 acre fire?
-
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Never heard of a fire wall?SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Tue Aug 07, 2018 3:04 pmA pearl of wisdom, from our great leader.
Donald J. Trump tweeted “California wildfires are being magnified & made so much worse by the bad environmental laws which aren't allowing massive amount of readily available water to be properly utilized. It is being diverted into the Pacific Ocean. Must also tree clear to stop fire spreading!”
we serve at the pleasure of a 5th grader. Welcome to America.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Tue Aug 07, 2018 3:13 pmWhat environmental law is diverting water to the ocean?
And how much water do you estimate is needed to put out a 300,000 acre fire?
The California water regulations designed to keep rivers intact. Good motivation, but poor outcome in this case.
With respect to the forests, outside of national forests where the feds let fires burn, communities put out all fires for safety of communities. But this means they also need to clear out those forests by manpower if not fire, and they do not want to spend money on it.
Where I live the overgrowth problem is severe outside the national forests. If there is a fire we don't fuck around with environmental regs and just pull the water directly out of the rivers, though.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
The Conservative wrote: ↑Tue Aug 07, 2018 3:26 pmNever heard of a fire wall?SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Tue Aug 07, 2018 3:04 pmA pearl of wisdom, from our great leader.
Donald J. Trump tweeted “California wildfires are being magnified & made so much worse by the bad environmental laws which aren't allowing massive amount of readily available water to be properly utilized. It is being diverted into the Pacific Ocean. Must also tree clear to stop fire spreading!”
we serve at the pleasure of a 5th grader. Welcome to America.
Firewall is too dangerous in very populated areas outside of emergency measures against existing fire. You have to go in the woods with men and machines and clear all that shit out if you are going to have a no fire policy.
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
My point is that you could drop a lake on that thing, and it wouldn't have any effect. It's fought with firewalls, and bulldozers, not water hoses.
I have exactly zero fire-fighting experience.
I have exactly zero fire-fighting experience.