GloryofGreece wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 3:58 pmIm not that attracted to what I've seen from Richard Spencer and/or Counter Currents and all the anti jew talk is just silly imo really. The only politician I can say looks/looked appealing is Pat Buchanan really. A Paleo Conservative. I just cant dig the Atheism/Paganism / fake/trendyness/futurism of most Alt-Right speakers, but a lot of what I read/hear appeals to me. Some doesn't.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 3:51 pmNeo-reactionaryGloryofGreece wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 3:49 pmI was a idealistic, navive, socialist leaning liberal throughout college and right out of school. Over the past roughly five years or so I have become more and more conservative traditonalist. I voted liberal every chance I got. I didn't vote in 2016. Mostly, what I can say is that I'm against Communism, Socialism, Modernism, Materialism, Atheism. etc. What does that make me now? Don't be to harsh...
When the Alt-right implodes from peak silliness, reaction is going to be what rises.
The antisemitism is going to be their undoing.
I do keep track of them to see where they are going because I am certain their implosion is the signal for true Reaction to rise again, and I have noticed quite a lot of them are actually becoming true reactionaries themselves. They are trying to bring reaction into the alt-right, but more likely the effect will be a growth out of that national socialism stuff towards true reaction in the same way that they grew out of libertarianism to wake up to identity and became alt-right.
There is an article at that journal I told you about that has a paragraph that sums up the problem of how the political "choices" we have today are no choice at all. It's what I have been trying to explain here for quite a while, but written better than I could write:
http://distributistreview.com/the-contr ... ervatives/Most Americans who are in the slightest degree politically active are inclined to hold one of the two chief political positions common in this country, what we call conservatism or liberalism. In fact, each of these blocs constitutes not only a political grouping, but a cultural group as well, each with its favorite publications and web sites, radio shows, almost its own distinct ways of dressing and eating. Although there is much that one could say about these two groups, I want to comment on one thing only about them. This is that each of them is conscious of the claims of the common good and firmly committed to restraint of human passions, backed up even by the authority of law, in one sphere or area of human life, and equally committed to a laissez-faire policy in another sphere. While each group seems to be aware of the dangers that unrestrained acquiescence in human weakness poses to the social good in one area, each is equally blind to those same dangers in another and equally crucial sphere of life.
Libertarianism, in my opinion, is the final fruition of modernity in that it simply embraces degeneracy in every sphere of human existence.
When people wake up to the fact that most of the choices that the media and society has provided them were no choices at all, it's going to be a revolutionary period. I just hope minds are not swayed by marxists or alt-right at this point. I don't want to live in either national socialism or communism.