This does a good job of explaining the strategy. They aren't really suing the civilians for anything other than to be protected from being sued by them. Those filing suit would have to go after the company that provided security. In the end, it's probably for the best. The company providing security failed in the job. Otherwise you could have people going after MGM simply because they see them as the bigger cash machine.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
It is obviously (to >85 IQ) not what dindus means.
It is also obvious that the litigation we are talking about is in the company's best interest, under the circumstances. As de O said, this process can be an excellent tactic under the right circumstances. I'm very confident that the decision on this litigation was made based upon very careful consideration.
A winning tactic? A pretty one? Maybe not, and certainly not pretty. Every day you are lucky enough to wake up, you have to play the cards you've been dealt.
I have my doubts that any amount of fake news propaganda is going to save them from the PR disaster that awaits them from this. It would have been easier to avoid this tactic altogether.
The idea that MGM is somehow immune from lawsuit is fucking absurd.
Speaker to Animals wrote: Wed Jul 18, 2018 11:35 am
It would have been easier to avoid this tactic altogether.
The lawyers seem to think otherwise.
Speaker to Animals wrote: Wed Jul 18, 2018 11:35 am
The idea that MGM is somehow immune from lawsuit is fucking absurd.
That's the root issue. Don't lay that problem on the feet of MGM until you have a complete understanding of role and input of the insurance industry into the enactment of the federal statutes and rules in place that give the insurance companies an out.
Speaker to Animals wrote: Wed Jul 18, 2018 11:35 am
It would have been easier to avoid this tactic altogether.
The lawyers seem to think otherwise.
Speaker to Animals wrote: Wed Jul 18, 2018 11:35 am
The idea that MGM is somehow immune from lawsuit is fucking absurd.
That's the root issue. Don't lay that problem on the feet of MGM until you have a complete understanding of the input of MGM's insurance companies' role and input into the enactment of the federal statutes and rules in place that give the insurance companies an out.