Context w/ The Present Unrest

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25408
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Context w/ The Present Unrest

Post by SuburbanFarmer »

Lulz. I use paypal once a year to pay for my fantasy football league dues. Direct deposit, pleb.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Context w/ The Present Unrest

Post by Speaker to Animals »

I just need your checking account and social security numbers to setup the deposit.
User avatar
GloryofGreece
Posts: 3007
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 8:29 am

Re: Context w/ The Present Unrest

Post by GloryofGreece »

Good points on Trump by Peterson
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7EaCVnw5n4
The good, the true, & the beautiful
User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28382
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Context w/ The Present Unrest

Post by C-Mag »

@GoG

I'll Check the video out later.

I'd the real difference in Civil Unrest of the present vs Past is that this is the first time since 1860ish when we have one partis leaders supporting and initiating Civil Unrest against the opposition party.

Am I wrong ?
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25408
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Context w/ The Present Unrest

Post by SuburbanFarmer »

C-Mag wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 12:00 pm @GoG

I'll Check the video out later.

I'd the real difference in Civil Unrest of the present vs Past is that this is the first time since 1860ish when we have one partis leaders supporting and initiating Civil Unrest against the opposition party.

Am I wrong ?
:lol: Seriously.

SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0
Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Context w/ The Present Unrest

Post by Okeefenokee »

I love how you think that's really damning.

Lefties rioting, burning cars, sending hundreds of people to the hospital, democrat politicians calling for more of it, fake news talking heads covering it up or blaming it on the victims, and this moron thinks he has the high ground because Trump said he'd beat up the guy that threatened to beat him up.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25408
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Context w/ The Present Unrest

Post by SuburbanFarmer »

Okeefenokee wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 12:53 pm I love how you think that's really damning.

Lefties rioting, burning cars, sending hundreds of people to the hospital, democrat politicians calling for more of it, fake news talking heads covering it up or blaming it on the victims, and this moron thinks he has the high ground because Trump said he'd beat up the guy that threatened to beat him up.
So... the side that controls all 3 branches of government isn't out in the street rioting, therefore, it doesn't matter that they're calling for violence. Because the other side not currently in power is acting on calls to violence.

You could not be more of a hack right now.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0
Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Context w/ The Present Unrest

Post by Okeefenokee »

SuburbanFarmer wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 12:59 pm
Okeefenokee wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 12:53 pm I love how you think that's really damning.

Lefties rioting, burning cars, sending hundreds of people to the hospital, democrat politicians calling for more of it, fake news talking heads covering it up or blaming it on the victims, and this moron thinks he has the high ground because Trump said he'd beat up the guy that threatened to beat him up.
So... the side that controls all 3 branches of government isn't out in the street rioting, therefore, it doesn't matter that they're calling for violence. Because the other side not currently in power is acting on calls to violence.

You could not be more of a hack right now.
I love how you're suddenly concerned about violence toward people who showed up in the wrong place to start trouble.

These are people who went to a private event with the specific intention of fucking it up to try and stop it, and a couple of them got punched for it, and your hypocrite lying ass can't keep your lies straight long enough to remember that you've already gone on page after page about how whatever happens to those people is their own fault.

Those aren't calls for violence. Those are dumbass lefties like you being dealt with for trying to fuck up someone else's private event.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25408
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Context w/ The Present Unrest

Post by SuburbanFarmer »

Okeefenokee wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 1:05 pm
SuburbanFarmer wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 12:59 pm
Okeefenokee wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 12:53 pm I love how you think that's really damning.

Lefties rioting, burning cars, sending hundreds of people to the hospital, democrat politicians calling for more of it, fake news talking heads covering it up or blaming it on the victims, and this moron thinks he has the high ground because Trump said he'd beat up the guy that threatened to beat him up.
So... the side that controls all 3 branches of government isn't out in the street rioting, therefore, it doesn't matter that they're calling for violence. Because the other side not currently in power is acting on calls to violence.

You could not be more of a hack right now.
I love how you're suddenly concerned about violence toward people who showed up in the wrong place to start trouble.

These are people who went to a private event with the specific intention of fucking it up to try and stop it, and a couple of them got punched for it, and your hypocrite lying ass can't keep your lies straight long enough to remember that you've already gone on page after page about how whatever happens to those people is their own fault.

Those aren't calls for violence. Those are dumbass lefties like you being dealt with for trying to fuck up someone else's private event.
AHHAHAHAAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA

You just made the exact same argument that I’ve been using, without a drop or irony. Holy. Shit.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0
User avatar
GloryofGreece
Posts: 3007
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 8:29 am

Re: Context w/ The Present Unrest

Post by GloryofGreece »

C-Mag wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 12:00 pm @GoG

I'll Check the video out later.

I'd the real difference in Civil Unrest of the present vs Past is that this is the first time since 1860ish when we have one partis leaders supporting and initiating Civil Unrest against the opposition party.

Am I wrong ?
Don't take this the wrong way because I don't want to sound sarcastic or flippant. I don't think I've said here before, but over the past 5 years I have deliberately watched/listened/read less and less "news". I selectively (like we all do to one degree or another) read an article here or there and/or listen to a few social/political podcasts and Youtube "clips" etc. So anyway, I really am unaware of any Democratic leader calling for violence or aggressive riots etc. Can you give me a few clear examples. I'm not talking about bloggers/Vloggers/journalist/or college students but actual elected party officials. Thanks.
Last edited by GloryofGreece on Mon Jul 16, 2018 1:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The good, the true, & the beautiful