Civil War Doomsday Clock

[Zlaxer]

No, I'm just thinking critically. I don't know for sure what happened before she got hit, and neither do you. But it's a pretty safe bet what she was there for.

You two would debate the merits of the rebels at Lexington and Concord - it doesn't matter what she was there....all that matters is that it happened...and will happen again....

The question is....does either side have over 10% who are ready to pull the trigger....I think each might....and that's what worries me.

One side has the will to pull the trigger, the other side, if they are lucky has airsoft guns.

The ANTIFA pajama boys are not what has me worried - Leftist have won more revolutions than traditional liberals (liberty seekers). I don't think it would be as one sided and as short as most here believe....

[The Conservative]

You two would debate the merits of the rebels at Lexington and Concord - it doesn't matter what she was there....all that matters is that it happened...and will happen again....

The question is....does either side have over 10% who are ready to pull the trigger....I think each might....and that's what worries me.

One side has the will to pull the trigger, the other side, if they are lucky has airsoft guns.

The ANTIFA pajama boys are not what has me worried - Leftist have won more revolutions than traditional liberals (liberty seekers). I don't think it would be as one sided and as short as most here believe....

The difference is most people aren’t “Leftists” in the US. They say they are, but push comes to shove they enjoy the freedoms that would be lost if the “leftists” won.

The war wouldn’t be short, but in reality, I believe US propper, the one waking up would win.

[C-Mag]

The ANTIFA pajama boys are not what has me worried - Leftist have won more revolutions than traditional liberals (liberty seekers). I don't think it would be as one sided and as short as most here believe....

Good questions being raised.

In Socialist type revolutions the Lefties typically have numbers on their sides, particularly in urban centers, which are usually power centers. They use masses to pressure change...………. and they are excellent at propaganda.

With Liberty Seekers they typically have smaller numbers but more skill at direct conflict. They typically have a harder time mobilizing numbers and spreading the word.

Question is, is it different in the digital age ?
I think it very well may be different.


What we see in the digital age is typical Leftist propaganda fails to mobilize masses. AntiFa, BLM, etc.
We also have at least one good example of Liberty minded Patriots. Bundyville.
The Bundy's were getting railroaded by the government and were able to use digital media to get their story out and assembled a small, but strongly armed force to defend them against federal agents.

[Speaker to Animals]

Here's the deal: people are going to side with strength.

The Internet is now saturated with images like that Proud Boy landing a haymaker on that Antifa puke. That looks really bad for the Marxists. I don't think they realize how incredibly bad their optics are now right now.

Nobody wants to join sides with the soyboys who dress up with masks, assault women with pepper spray and clubs, and then get knocked the fuck out by larger men.

CNN cannot possibly make this appealing.

[Speaker to Animals]

Also.. and this part amazes me.. the Marxists are totally losing the war over language finally. They are getting completely slammed with words to describe their antics and personalities; such as soyboy, cuck, mangina, SJW, etc. Meanwhile, the ridiculous words they concoct -- woke, mansplaning, etc. -- are ridiculed.

[C-Mag]

Also.. and this part amazes me.. the Marxists are totally losing the war over language finally. They are getting completely slammed with words to describe their antics and personalities; such as soyboy, cuck, mangina, SJW, etc. Meanwhile, the ridiculous words they concoct -- woke, mansplaning, etc. -- are ridiculed.

+1

Good points. on Imagery and the war on language

The Left still controls the Narrative with the few still on corporate media and the bulk of those in urban terrain. Had the corporate media not gone nuts with the Trump election, they would still have a dominant position in messaging.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Ask him what he thinks she might have been doing that would have warranted the assault.

Taunting a mob.

Easily one of the stupidest activities that a human could engage in.

[Okeefenokee]

Ask him what he thinks she might have been doing that would have warranted the assault.

Taunting a mob.

Easily one of the stupidest activities that a human could engage in.

She attended a political event wearing political apparel, and for that you say physical assault against her was warranted.

You're human trash.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Ask him what he thinks she might have been doing that would have warranted the assault.

Taunting a mob.

Easily one of the stupidest activities that a human could engage in.

She attended a political event wearing political apparel, and for that you say physical assault against her was warranted.

You're human trash.

Never said it was warranted. But certainly expected.

You are one ignorant bastard.

[Okeefenokee]

Taunting a mob.

Easily one of the stupidest activities that a human could engage in.

She attended a political event wearing political apparel, and for that you say physical assault against her was warranted.

You're human trash.

Never said it was warranted. But certainly expected.

You are one ignorant bastard.

Ask him what he thinks she might have been doing that would have warranted the assault.

Taunting a mob.

Liar says what?