Do you believe the world would be a better place if your political opponents were dead?

[BjornP]

I am not going to bother reading the whole thing until you actually respond to what I wrote, dude.

In this context, the people I am talking about are the Swedish people. At what point do you suppose the Swedish people who are slated for near extermination in only a handful of generations have a justification for fighting back against the Swedes who convinced themselves of this cause?

The answer to your question: "At what point do you suppose we are justified in fighting back?" starts at the fourth line of my post. Begins with: "As for your..." and goes on till the end.

The answer to your previous question of wether Swedes was at the point where lethal force was warranted against political opponents was: "No". The explanation for that reply followed that "No".

So, I did respond to what you wrote.

[Speaker to Animals]

I am not going to bother reading the whole thing until you actually respond to what I wrote, dude.

In this context, the people I am talking about are the Swedish people. At what point do you suppose the Swedish people who are slated for near extermination in only a handful of generations have a justification for fighting back against the Swedes who convinced themselves of this cause?

The answer to your question: "At what point do you suppose we are justified in fighting back?" starts at the fourth line of my post. Begins with: "As for your..." and goes on till the end.

The answer to your previous question of wether Swedes was at the point where lethal force was warranted against political opponents was: "No". The explanation for that reply followed that "No".

So, I did respond to what you wrote.

You didn't respond. You launched into a tirade and a straw man about "my people" and I just stopped reading right there.


Again:

If 60% of Danes decided that Danes as a people deserve to be extinguished in a soft genocide, then are the 40% of Danes who don't want their people and culture to perish supposed to just let it happen?

Serious question. Try answering it.

[BjornP]

I am not going to bother reading the whole thing until you actually respond to what I wrote, dude.

In this context, the people I am talking about are the Swedish people. At what point do you suppose the Swedish people who are slated for near extermination in only a handful of generations have a justification for fighting back against the Swedes who convinced themselves of this cause?

The answer to your question: "At what point do you suppose we are justified in fighting back?" starts at the fourth line of my post. Begins with: "As for your..." and goes on till the end.

The answer to your previous question of wether Swedes was at the point where lethal force was warranted against political opponents was: "No". The explanation for that reply followed that "No".

So, I did respond to what you wrote.

You didn't respond. You launched into a tirade and a straw man about "my people" and I just stopped reading right there.


Again:

If 60% of Danes decided that Danes as a people deserve to be extinguished in a soft genocide, then are the 40% of Danes who don't want their people and culture to perish supposed to just let it happen?

Serious question. Try answering it.

No, the 40% are not suppoed to just let it happen.

Counterquestion, then: Are 60%, or any significant percentage of Swedes, engaging in a soft genocide of Swedes or are/were you just asking general questions about things not happening in the real world?

[Speaker to Animals]

The answer to your question: "At what point do you suppose we are justified in fighting back?" starts at the fourth line of my post. Begins with: "As for your..." and goes on till the end.

The answer to your previous question of wether Swedes was at the point where lethal force was warranted against political opponents was: "No". The explanation for that reply followed that "No".

So, I did respond to what you wrote.

You didn't respond. You launched into a tirade and a straw man about "my people" and I just stopped reading right there.


Again:

If 60% of Danes decided that Danes as a people deserve to be extinguished in a soft genocide, then are the 40% of Danes who don't want their people and culture to perish supposed to just let it happen?

Serious question. Try answering it.

No, the 40% are not suppoed to just let it happen.

Counterquestion, then: Are 60%, or any significant percentage of Swedes, engaging in a soft genocide of Swedes or are/were you just asking general questions about things not happening in the real world?

I honestly don't know what percentage of Swedes actually support the genocide of the Swedish people. It seems like more than 60%, but I don't know for sure.

The mentality and ideology behind it, however, is prevalent across the Western world. It's only a matter of degree. If these people ever get enough power to do it in your country, you better bet your pastry-loving Danish ass they will set about the destruction of the Danish people to create what they believe is a one-world utopia of cappuccino people.

[DBTrek]

Leftists - We value diversity more than anyone else, which is why we won’t relent with anti-Western policies until the entire world is a uniform light-brown.


Nothing is as diverse as everyone looking and believing the same, eh?

[ooky]

That's not what I meant.

The white left across the western world are to some degree hell-bent on genociding their fellow whites. In Sweden, they have gone so far as to reasonably achieve a genocide of the Swedish people within a few generations.

The Muslims really need to go home. That's a separate issue. I am talking about divisions within our own people in which one group has decided it would be a great idea to exterminate us all in a soft genocide.

At what point do you suppose we are justified in fighting back?

Fever dreams....

[Speaker to Animals]

That's not what I meant.

The white left across the western world are to some degree hell-bent on genociding their fellow whites. In Sweden, they have gone so far as to reasonably achieve a genocide of the Swedish people within a few generations.

The Muslims really need to go home. That's a separate issue. I am talking about divisions within our own people in which one group has decided it would be a great idea to exterminate us all in a soft genocide.

At what point do you suppose we are justified in fighting back?

Fever dreams....

Okay. Great discussion. Have a nice day, I guess.

[Montegriffo]

Nothing is as diverse as everyone looking and believing the same, eh?

Two very different things.
Unless you think all people of a certain hue share the same beliefs.
Race and culture are not the same thing.

[Okeefenokee]

That's not what I meant.

The white left across the western world are to some degree hell-bent on genociding their fellow whites. In Sweden, they have gone so far as to reasonably achieve a genocide of the Swedish people within a few generations.

The Muslims really need to go home. That's a separate issue. I am talking about divisions within our own people in which one group has decided it would be a great idea to exterminate us all in a soft genocide.

At what point do you suppose we are justified in fighting back?

Fever dreams....

That's what you and your commie buddies said about the holocaust too.

[Speaker to Animals]

Nothing is as diverse as everyone looking and believing the same, eh?

Two very different things.
Unless you think all people of a certain hue share the same beliefs.
Race and culture are not the same thing.

Back that up.

Because history and fucking reality all about us contradict you.