Montegriffo wrote: Mon Jun 04, 2018 3:59 pm
Well, he can spend all day whining about it or he can get on with trying to be a good President.
Seems like whining is his forte.
He's doing pretty damn well.
Hey, can you Brits shouldn't be meddling in our elections.
SuburbanFarmer wrote: Mon Jun 04, 2018 4:02 pm
If you can hear me up there, could you please remind me what vote I should have cast that was “anti-war”?
While you’re at it, could you remind me which of “my friends” you’re talking about?
One more thing... are you proposing nuclear annihalation of any terrorist “threat”, or uppity dictator from now on? Because that’s what Total War means now.
I'm speaking to you as an average American citizen.
Less than 1% serve and see the working end of US foreign policy.
Nuclear weapons have more negatives that positives for our current force.
But they are in the arsenal and can be used if necessary.
HahahahhahaahhahahaahahahMWAhahahhahaHAHHAHAHHAHAHAAHH! Fuck, gonna miss all this when the next stuffed-shirt duopolist gets into the WH. Better enjoy it while we have it folks, we may not see his like again.
DBTrek wrote: Mon Jun 04, 2018 5:26 pm
Ohhhhhh shit he just canceled the Eagles SuperBowl victory event and invited the fans to attend a national anthem party instead.
HahahahhahaahhahahaahahahMWAhahahhahaHAHHAHAHHAHAHAAHH! Fuck, gonna miss all this when the next stuffed-shirt duopolist gets into the WH. Better enjoy it while we have it folks, we may not see his like again.
SuburbanFarmer wrote: Mon Jun 04, 2018 4:02 pm
If you can hear me up there, could you please remind me what vote I should have cast that was “anti-war”?
While you’re at it, could you remind me which of “my friends” you’re talking about?
One more thing... are you proposing nuclear annihalation of any terrorist “threat”, or uppity dictator from now on? Because that’s what Total War means now.
I'm speaking to you as an average American citizen.
Less than 1% serve and see the working end of US foreign policy.
Nuclear weapons have more negatives that positives for our current force.
But they are in the arsenal and can be used if necessary.
Again, if you had total control over the results, which candidates were the “anti-war” choices?
And we’re already spending over half the national budget on 1% of the population serving. You think we should increase that number?