Right up there with “if you have it I can take it = capitalism”

Can’t make this shit up folks, these people really believe this stuff.
Does it benefit swipple and hipster communities? If not then no. First we must agree to protect our nascent White Folk Art communities in the name of DIVERSITYOkeefenokee wrote: Thu May 24, 2018 9:55 am So who here's ready to talk about reigning in the franchise?
That's fine, but Seattle is taking that money to help their homeless problem. They've already wasted millions and all they accomplished was making the homeless problem worse. What evidence do you have that this time, Seattle will use the money wisely?Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: Thu May 24, 2018 9:55 am
The 'great service' is Amazon's service that I am paying for. See the sentence you snipped out of the quote for context.
They didnt focuse on maintaining the working class White community. If they had, Seattle would have told Amazon to take a hike because they would have all the tax revenue their greedy little fingers could spend for generations to come. Short sighted.Kath wrote: Thu May 24, 2018 9:59 amThat's fine, but Seattle is taking that money to help their homeless problem. They've already wasted millions and all they accomplished was making the homeless problem worse. What evidence do you have that this time, Seattle will use the money wisely?Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: Thu May 24, 2018 9:55 am
The 'great service' is Amazon's service that I am paying for. See the sentence you snipped out of the quote for context.
Why should Amazon and other companies give Seattle money so that Seattle can waste it? What part of this is confusing for you?
If your grown child kept coming to you for money to fix a problem they have, like, say, fixing a car, and they took that money and bought hookers and blow with it, would you be eager to give them another handout because this time, he really really means it and he will use it to fix the car?
They spent about sixty million dollars on day care for about 800 families. It came out to close to $70k per household.Kath wrote: Thu May 24, 2018 9:53 amGreat service? They have already spent millions upon millions to fix their homeless problem and all they accomplished was making their homeless problem worse. What evidence do you have that this time, it will fix the problem, when they have never successfully spent the money before?Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: Thu May 24, 2018 9:49 am
Potentially mutually beneficial, for a very low cost per consumer, for a great service. That smells like capitalism working exactly the way it should, despite the possibility of failure.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
Your knack for misrepresenting arguments and presenting them uncharitably is really uncanny.DBTrek wrote: Thu May 24, 2018 9:56 am Cities leveraging arbitrary taxes and unaccountably squandering hundreds of millions = capitalism working as intended
Right up there with “if you have it I can take it = capitalism”
![]()
Can’t make this shit up folks, these people really believe this stuff.
said Seattle to the businesses as they left.Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: Thu May 24, 2018 10:02 amYour whole argument is just bitchy cynicism. Good luck with it.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
Should? Well, it is legal to levy taxes, so they should pay them, or fight them, or, whatever.Kath wrote: Thu May 24, 2018 9:59 amThat's fine, but Seattle is taking that money to help their homeless problem. They've already wasted millions and all they accomplished was making the homeless problem worse. What evidence do you have that this time, Seattle will use the money wisely?Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: Thu May 24, 2018 9:55 am
The 'great service' is Amazon's service that I am paying for. See the sentence you snipped out of the quote for context.
Why should Amazon and other companies give Seattle money so that Seattle can waste it? What part of this is confusing for you?
If your grown child kept coming to you for money to fix a problem they have, like, say, fixing a car, and they took that money and bought hookers and blow with it, would you be eager to give them another handout because this time, he really really means it and he will use it to fix the car?
Are they leaving?Okeefenokee wrote: Thu May 24, 2018 10:04 amsaid Seattle to the businesses as they left.Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: Thu May 24, 2018 10:02 amYour whole argument is just bitchy cynicism. Good luck with it.