Seattle Socialists Strangle Golden Goose

[TheReal_ND]

By "Artistic Soul of Seattle" he means White people. Not that other races don't have their "Artistic Soul" but it's generally assumed we aren't talking about the destruction of "Black Soul" (cause if that were the case jews would be brow beating us about it on social media every day,) in Seattle. In which case, a billion dollars is too cheap to justify the destruction of our nascent Hipster communities.

Blood and Soil.

[Speaker to Animals]

Didn't the Sheriff of Nortingham say the exact same thing in Disney's Robin Hood before stealing food from orphans?

HM, that's a terrible argument.

[Kath]

I did. I think you presented a false dilemma.

So you dispute the facts presented in this thread that the homeless problem in Seattle got worse when they spent all that money to try and "fix" the problem? Can you show evidence that the money was well spent and solved the homeless problem?

Seattle has ADMITTED that they didn't spend the money well. Yet, you are here arguing that it didn't happen.

[DBTrek]

It seems if they have money to spend on repealing the head tax, that means they have money to spend on the head tax, no?

That has to be the worst argument for more taxes than any I have ever encountered.

And yet, the most honest argument we’ve seen from the leftists. They truly believe if someone else earns money, they’re entitled to seize it and use it however they want. After all, eat the rich. If they have it, it’s ok for us to take it.

One of those rare moments when a leftist unintentionally shows their true colors, and lays their philosophy bare before the public.
/shrug

[Speaker to Animals]

Why not spend the money on charter buses to drop the homeless off in San Francisco?

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Didn't the Sheriff of Nortingham say the exact same thing in Disney's Robin Hood before stealing food from orphans?

HM, that's a terrible argument.

The argument is that Amazon is willing and able to spend money to stay in Seattle, which makes me think that they aren't going to be chased off by a head tax.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

I did. I think you presented a false dilemma.

So you dispute the facts presented in this thread that the homeless problem in Seattle got worse when they spent all that money to try and "fix" the problem? Can you show evidence that the money was well spent and solved the homeless problem?

Seattle has ADMITTED that they didn't spend the money well. Yet, you are here arguing that it didn't happen.

All of those facts can be true, and your have still presented a false dilemma.

And beside the point, since I am only trying to argue that the Goose remains unbestrangled.

[TheReal_ND]

BLUT UND BODEN



We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children

Fear not swipple. (((Amazon))) is nothing that a united White Race can not overcome.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

It seems if they have money to spend on repealing the head tax, that means they have money to spend on the head tax, no?

That has to be the worst argument for more taxes than any I have ever encountered.

And yet, the most honest argument we’ve seen from the leftists. They truly believe if someone else earns money, they’re entitled to seize it and use it however they want. After all, eat the rich. If they have it, it’s ok for us to take it.

One of those rare moments when a leftist unintentionally shows their true colors, and lays their philosophy bare before the public.
/shrug

Yeah, we get it, tax is theft. Now, explain why you think it is likely, given its willingness to spend, you think Amazon is getting chased out of bonny Warshington.

[Kath]

All of those facts can be true, and your have still presented a false dilemma.

And beside the point, since I am only trying to argue that the Goose remains unbestrangled.

How so? Seattle wasted all that money on a non-plan. Now they are out of money so they are going after the job creators for even more money to throw at their non solution.

If Seattle was going to put the money to good use, and they had a proven record of using other people's money efficiently, there's less of an issue. But, we already know the money will be wasted, so why let them have it?