Here's the link: http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/09/opinions/ ... y-stanley/
Sadly (and what should have been expected), the author ends up condemning Hollywood for basically not being Liberal enough.


I hope they block him. Hard to say what we might get on round two if that happens, though.Fife wrote:Well the confirmation fun starts this week.
Will Senators Paul, Cruz, Flake, Lee, or any other GOP dead-enders call on Sessions to answer for his stupid Obama/Holder/Lynch positions?
Conservatives Should Think Twice before Supporting Jeff Sessions
SAD!For instance, he sharply departs from the growing bipartisan consensus on criminal-justice reform. . . .
At a time when 32 states have legalized medical and/or recreational use of marijuana, Sessions told a Senate hearing last April that, “we need grown-ups in charge in Washington to say marijuana is not the kind of thing that ought to be legalized, it ought not to be minimized, that it’s in fact a very real danger.” . . .
Moreover, as George Will has pointed out, Sessions also opposes the reform of asset-forfeiture laws. He has defended these laws, which are considered by most observers to be widely abused, as a means of taking money from people who have “done nothing in their lives but sell dope.” . . .
Elsewhere, he has defended the ability of the NSA and other federal agencies to spy on Americans. Last April, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives unanimously passed the Email Privacy Act, designed to require that law-enforcement agencies receive a warrant before they can compel tech firms such as Google and Microsoft to hand over Americans’ stored cell-phone communications. Sessions introduced an amendment to the bill that would have created a loophole allowing law enforcement to demand such data without a warrant. . . .
Finally, he has opposed legislation protecting the jobs of federal whistle-blowers and shield laws protecting journalists from having to disclose their sources.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
That's a brilliant strategy. "oh, you don't want me to cut my arm off? Well fuck you!!"Speaker to Animals wrote:Yeah, I like that these picks are getting their manginas in a twist. That's qualification enough. If the progs like the appointee, then I am against him.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:That's a brilliant strategy. "oh, you don't want me to cut my arm off? Well fuck you!!"Speaker to Animals wrote:Yeah, I like that these picks are getting their manginas in a twist. That's qualification enough. If the progs like the appointee, then I am against him.
I don't either, but I still say the drug war needs to end. Going after sanctuary cities is okay with me.Speaker to Animals wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:That's a brilliant strategy. "oh, you don't want me to cut my arm off? Well fuck you!!"Speaker to Animals wrote:Yeah, I like that these picks are getting their manginas in a twist. That's qualification enough. If the progs like the appointee, then I am against him.
Well, I don't smoke weed, and I don't post ISIS propaganda on Facebook, so it's not like Sessions is a threat to me personally.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751