384 Socialized Liability

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 19146
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

384 Socialized Liability

Post by Martin Hash »

Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
User avatar
Hanarchy Montanarchy
Posts: 5991
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am

Re: 384 Socialized Liability

Post by Hanarchy Montanarchy »

You get more of what you subsidize... so, erm... hold my beer. :twisted:
HAIL!

Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 19146
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: 384 Socialized Liability

Post by Martin Hash »

You think people would break their arm so they could get it fixed?
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: 384 Socialized Liability

Post by Speaker to Animals »

What about punitive measures for negligence?

I am not a lawyer obviously, but it seems like socialized liability would run counter to the common law basis of our legal system. You'd have to change quite a lot. Interesting idea, though.
User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 19146
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: 384 Socialized Liability

Post by Martin Hash »

Speaker to Animals wrote:What about punitive measures for negligence?

I am not a lawyer obviously, but it seems like socialized liability would run counter to the common law basis of our legal system. You'd have to change quite a lot. Interesting idea, though.
You can still have those but they aren't civil, they're criminal, and go into the Universal Liability fund.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
brewster
Posts: 1848
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:33 pm

Re: 384 Socialized Liability

Post by brewster »

Martin Hash wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:What about punitive measures for negligence?

I am not a lawyer obviously, but it seems like socialized liability would run counter to the common law basis of our legal system. You'd have to change quite a lot. Interesting idea, though.
You can still have those but they aren't civil, they're criminal, and go into the Universal Liability fund.
That might work for your standard sidewalk slip n fall, but we don't do so well prosecuting big corporations, they have deeper pockets and can outgun any government legal team. Only way to solve that is to fund the prosecutors with the fines, but we can't even manage that for the SEC.
We are only accustomed to dealing with like twenty online personas at a time so when we only have about ten people some people have to be strawmanned in order to advance our same relative go nowhere nonsense positions. -TheReal_ND
User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: 384 Socialized Liability

Post by DBTrek »

Great deal for gang-land dwellers and people who build in the paths of hurricanes.

Horrible deal for the rest of us.

“I know you worked hard to get to a good neighborhood with good schools, but all that property damage and personal injury going on in Chicago has to be paid by someone. Plus Katrina 2 just leveled New Orleans 2, again. So pony up, dumbass”.

No thanks.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: 384 Socialized Liability

Post by Speaker to Animals »

He's not talking about flood insurance.

It's actually an interesting concept.
User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 19146
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: 384 Socialized Liability

Post by Martin Hash »

First, liability and insurance aren't the same thing. Second, 13 or 14 States have No Fault auto liability now, and have for years.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: 384 Socialized Liability

Post by DBTrek »

When we’re all paying into a money pool, to award damages to people who suffer losses - you can say that’s not insurance but I’m not seeing a huge difference.

Furthermore, since some people inhabit areas where more property and individuals are damaged than others, then obviously people in safer areas are going to be subsidizing those in less safe areas.

Why?
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"