Real Rules?

Do you support any of the below rules for decorum on the forum?

Do not shit on Martin and do not shit in his threads.
7
21%
The owner of a thread gets to decide when the off-topic detour becomes disruptive/spam
6
18%
No hardcore porn, including descriptive text
8
24%
None of the above
12
36%
 
Total votes: 33

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by K@th » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:58 pm

StCapps wrote: Right so just make sure the log of deletions is cut off before it gets to you deleting clubgop's post.
Just double down on your nonsense.

First entry showing is from Thursday, then all the Wednesday entries, last entry is from Tuesday. What you are looking at is the last action on Tuesday, ALL of Wednesday and the first action on Thursday.

Seriously. You are wrong. Deal. With. It. You are wrong. Everyone can see that. DB is right, you are high right now.
Account abandoned.

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Real Rules?

Post by DBTrek » Fri Feb 23, 2018 1:01 pm

He never shares tho.
Which is wrong.
If Capps we’re here right now I’d give him a 10mg THC butterscotch edible that would have his conspiracies dressed in tie-dye.
But does he ever pass the Dutchie is even one time?
Nope.
He just gets high and yells at us.

Harshin’ folks buzz and shit.
Not very cool, Canadawg.
Last edited by DBTrek on Fri Feb 23, 2018 1:01 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Real Rules?

Post by StCapps » Fri Feb 23, 2018 1:01 pm

Whatever, you aren't trustworthy, the post got deleted, you get the blame, your screenshot means jack shit.
*yip*

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by Fife » Fri Feb 23, 2018 1:02 pm

DBTrek wrote:
Martin Hash wrote:Smitty said “no rules.”

That’ll be no rules then. (Here anyway, I still got to get famous.)
Anarchy. For the high ass derp sherpas.
;)
Point of order; May it please the Court.

Image
Fife wrote:
Martin Hash wrote:Smitty said “no rules.”

That’ll be no rules then. (Here anyway, I still got to get famous.)
+1 Martin.

However, MUCH more important than "no rules," IMNSHO, is NO RULERS.

We can survive a rule or two; but we won't survive "moderation."

Other than you, sir, you own the place; it's your property to do with as you please. I'm just suggesting a strict NO RULERS ethos. It served Dan's forum pretty well until Dan decided to shutter the whole shop. Dan chose to close it all down rather than to impose "moderation." So be it. I trust you to make a reasoned decision as the owner of this place if something is too much for you to stomach being displayed on your property.

If you are going to have Kath, or anyone -- ANYONE -- in a position to impose some arbitrary correction for violation of some rule, this forum is going to suck the kind of donkey dick we've been subjected to lately.

Not fun; not productive; not worthwhile. It's either a Free Fire Zone or it's shit.

Again, this is not a personal attack on Kath, it's an attack on the office.

NO RULERS. The members of this forum are more than capable to police any mischief without threats and rumors of "moderation," or whatever. Fuck that noise. This is a barroom fight, as Smits would put it. We'll break some shit occasionally, we'll shit up each other occasionally, but overall we'll sort out the shitheads and move forward. Darwin didn't have any "moderators" or po-pos in his book, as far as I'm told.
Later last week, after I posted that ^ viewtopic.php?p=159234#p159234, the following post was yanked from a thread in which I was trying to move the discussion towards civil order and put, against my will, and with zero notice, into some forum holding cell called "Bickering" viewtopic.php?p=159882#p159882:
Fife wrote:
Smitty-48 wrote:My daggers are directed at posts being deleted arbitrarily under the rule of a "moderator", NHL misdirection, merely an instrument,
Good show, sir.

I'm a good sport for the "rules."

I'm a hard-assed motherfucker against the "rulers."
That post is worthy of being involuntarily yanked from the stage? Oh yeah, I protest.


IMNSHO, we could do fine with a rule or two. We don't need any stinking batches around here though, ese.


User avatar
DrYouth
Posts: 4050
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:13 pm
Location: Canadastan

Re: Real Rules?

Post by DrYouth » Fri Feb 23, 2018 1:02 pm

OMG

This feels exactly my kids arguing in the backseat of the car.

I'll tell you how sometimes goes...

"SHut the F up!.... Don't make me pull this car over!

You are both grounded when we get home!"

But today is a good day.

Not going to get dragged down.... gonna keep driving...
Maybe put some music on to drown it out.
Tune them out... stay in the happy place.
Deep down tho, I still thirst to kill you and eat you. Ultra Chimp can't help it.. - Smitty

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Real Rules?

Post by StCapps » Fri Feb 23, 2018 1:03 pm

DBTrek wrote:He never shares tho.
Which is wrong.
If Capps we’re here right now I’d give him a 10mg THC butterscotch edible that would have his conspiracies dressed in tie-dye.
But does he ever pass the Dutch is even one time?
Nope.
He just gets high and yells at us.

Harshin’ folks buzz and shit.
Not very cool, Canadawg.
Haven't had any marijuana yet today, so nice theory, but it's incorrect, you just have a shitty argument and are trying to deflect. But now I will get high, because this serves as a good reminder that I should do so. So if you want to claim that I'm high after this post, go right ahead, finally you will be making an accurate statement.
Last edited by StCapps on Fri Feb 23, 2018 1:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by K@th » Fri Feb 23, 2018 1:03 pm

StCapps wrote:Whatever, you aren't trustworthy, the post got deleted, you get the blame, your screenshot means jack shit.
It says right on the fucking screen that Smitty deleted his own post. Dude. WTF?
Account abandoned.

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Real Rules?

Post by DBTrek » Fri Feb 23, 2018 1:05 pm

Well, if we’re descending into pedantry, I’d ask “Who makes and enforced rules?”

Hmmmmmmm ... that works of be rulers. So anarchy the word may be derived from Greek meaning “no rulers”. But a social coexistence without rules reflects a state of anarchy.

So suck it, Trebek.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Real Rules?

Post by StCapps » Fri Feb 23, 2018 1:06 pm

Kath wrote:
StCapps wrote:Whatever, you aren't trustworthy, the post got deleted, you get the blame, your screenshot means jack shit.
It says right on the fucking screen that Smitty deleted his own post. Dude. WTF?
I was talking about clubgop, but now it's time to get high, fuck you and the horse you rode in on. You don't want a truce, you're just fronting.
*yip*

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Real Rules?

Post by StCapps » Fri Feb 23, 2018 1:06 pm

DBTrek wrote:Well, if we’re descending into pedantry, I’d ask “Who makes and enforced rules?”

Hmmmmmmm ... that works of be rulers. So anarchy the word may be derived from Greek meaning “no rulers”. But a social coexistence without rules reflects a state of anarchy.

So suck it, Trebek.
*yawns*
*yip*