Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18809
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18809
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18809
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18809
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
-
Penner
- Posts: 3350
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:00 pm
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Dogs are better than cats. Sure cats do have their cuteness and purposes but dogs are so much more better pets because they are (like humans) social animals.
-
K@th
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
-
clubgop
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
So is paparazzi pics of a stars house, that is not the point. See the cultural disconnect? The foreigners don't get it. You, monte, GCF, Bjorn But the Americans and tjose that understand them do.DrYouth wrote:Well it would be funnier for you if repeating it made Monte look bad.clubgop wrote:You don't know about the Streisand effect?DrYouth wrote:Someone want to translate what Clubby just posted?
I don't speak Clubby.
He is enjoying his lunatic rant against Monte being repeated... or something....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect
Yes, you do. You are not fooling anybody.
Like for example if it was a skilled takedown.
But basically it's like us reposting evidence of you being a twat...