What is this gun?

User avatar
Hastur
Posts: 5297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: suiþiuþu

What is this gun?

Post by Hastur »

The ship is a Chineese Type 072III-class landing ship (NATO designation Yuting-II class) nr. 936 and goes by the name 海洋山 (Haiyang Shan).

Normally it has a twin 37mm gun in the bow but this one has gotten something new.

Image

Image

Normal configuration

Image

Any cool theories about what they are up to? is it a railgun? Those containers could be the power supply.

Anyone here read chinese?

Image
Image

An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna

Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck
User avatar
Hastur
Posts: 5297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: suiþiuþu

Re: What is this gun?

Post by Hastur »

Closeup

Image
Image

An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna

Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18852
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: What is this gun?

Post by Montegriffo »

Death, death, to the IDF.

Image
User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14815
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: What is this gun?

Post by The Conservative »

It's made in China... it shoots a few times and needs to be replaced because it's voided its warranty for being used more than for just show.
#NotOneRedCent
User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28399
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: What is this gun?

Post by C-Mag »

That Naval shit is out of league
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: What is this gun?

Post by Smitty-48 »

The US Navy has already begun to abandon its plans for a railgun, $500 million spent, not anywhere close to being operational, another rube goldberg device MIC boondoggle to be cast upon the scrap heap of cost inefficiency.

Putting aside the fact that, strategically, the whole concept of war by bigger, faster firing, longer ranged guns; was proven to be folly in the First World War, the guns themselves also became too clever by half, so expensive and fraught with complexity, that not only did they not win the war, they bankrupted the co-belligerents in the process.
Nec Aspera Terrent
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: What is this gun?

Post by Speaker to Animals »

That's my problem with most of our defense spending. Too complex. These are vulnerabilities.

KISS.

I like a lot of Russian gear precisely because they get it (although some of their shit seems overly complex, especially their air defense systems).
Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: What is this gun?

Post by Smitty-48 »

Any attempt by the Chinese to achieve decision by firepower would likely result exactly as it did for the Germans in the First World War, firepower stalemate, up to and including hydrogen bombs, followed by American led international naval blockade for the win, railguns et al; no stick there, strategic waste of time, effort, and money.
Nec Aspera Terrent
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: What is this gun?

Post by Speaker to Animals »

I always suspected they are working on exploits against our own cylon bullshit.

Cyberwarfare, EMP, etc.

No point trying to go all Clausewitz against the US. It's more feasible for them to to exploit all these vulnerabilities.
Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: What is this gun?

Post by Smitty-48 »

What's the rush? They've got all the time in the world, every Hegemon has an arc, just sit back, bide your time, and America will bring itself down from within, giving America a foreign threat to rally against is counterproductive, left to their own devices, Americans will turn upon themselves.
Nec Aspera Terrent