Lions for Lambs made money, $63 million on a $35 million budget, so that's a 45% margin, the Post cost $50 million, so it needs to make $77.5 million to catch Lions for Lambs.PartyOf5 wrote:The Post will be a dud at the box office. This is going to be about as popular as that Tom Cruise movie Lions for Lambs.
Over/Under on number of times they mention the current Washington Post is owned by CIA Contractor Jeff Bezos?Smitty-48 wrote:Lions for Lambs made money, $63 million on a $35 million budget, so that's a 45% margin, the Post cost $50 million, so it needs to make $77.5 million to catch Lions for Lambs.PartyOf5 wrote:The Post will be a dud at the box office. This is going to be about as popular as that Tom Cruise movie Lions for Lambs.
Mind you, it's the one of the few movies out there that I'm interested in seeing, Spielberg + Hanks + Historical, and I'm there, but I'll just wait for it to come to pay-per-view.
A Union Busting Company Man? More power to him.kybkh wrote:Over/Under on number of times they mention the current Washington Post is owned by CIA Contractor Jeff Bezos?Smitty-48 wrote:Lions for Lambs made money, $63 million on a $35 million budget, so that's a 45% margin, the Post cost $50 million, so it needs to make $77.5 million to catch Lions for Lambs.PartyOf5 wrote:The Post will be a dud at the box office. This is going to be about as popular as that Tom Cruise movie Lions for Lambs.
Mind you, it's the one of the few movies out there that I'm interested in seeing, Spielberg + Hanks + Historical, and I'm there, but I'll just wait for it to come to pay-per-view.
I feel like there isn't a lot of movies being made like The Post nor Lions for Lambs.Smitty-48 wrote:Lions for Lambs made money, $63 million on a $35 million budget, so that's a 45% margin, the Post cost $50 million, so it needs to make $77.5 million to catch Lions for Lambs.PartyOf5 wrote:The Post will be a dud at the box office. This is going to be about as popular as that Tom Cruise movie Lions for Lambs.
Mind you, it's the one of the few movies out there that I'm interested in seeing, Spielberg + Hanks + Historical, and I'm there, but I'll just wait for it to come to pay-per-view.
2018 will see Superhero movies fade in popularity.Penner wrote:All major blockbusters will be about Superheros.
Maybe but the MCU has movie plans for like 202....something. So I won't doubt that it won't end- at least until China gets sick of them. I mean wasn't the last Transformer movie was literally saved by China's box office?C-Mag wrote:2018 will see Superhero movies fade in popularity.Penner wrote:All major blockbusters will be about Superheros.
I get that. I just see them already falling off in the US..................... Transformers is awful.Penner wrote:Maybe but the MCU has movie plans for like 202....something. So I won't doubt that it won't end- at least until China gets sick of them. I mean wasn't the last Transformer movie was literally saved by China's box office?C-Mag wrote:2018 will see Superhero movies fade in popularity.Penner wrote:All major blockbusters will be about Superheros.
Absolution Style by Premium phpBB Styles
