If you want to smoke weed, move to a state where you can. There are over a dozen of them now. Every state that legalizes weed erodes whatever excuses you have for breaking the law.
All the burnouts can move to California. It's a fair trade since California's sending us all their jobs.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
MilSpecs wrote:
Personally I'd rather be in rehab, but involuntary means the possibility of jail time anyway. People get sent to rehab, fail and then go to jail all the time.
so let's just do nothing and keep sending people to prison for weed.
this is classic, oppose everything the other side does, even if it's what I want, lest they get credit for doing anything right.
Okeefenokee wrote:If you want to smoke weed, move to a state where you can. There are over a dozen of them now. Every state that legalizes weed erodes whatever excuses you have for breaking the law.
All the burnouts can move to California. It's a fair trade since California's sending us all their jobs.
NJ is increasingly in favor. I don't partake but also don't like the hypocrisy of someone who drinks jailing someone who smokes weed. A drug is a drug. The person who drinks isn't clean and the person who smokes isn't clean, but I don't care what they do as long as they're not driving. Regardless of my personal feelings, though, Christie is a snake. I doubt he gives a rat's ass about people struggling with addiction and I have no doubt he wants some of that prison money for himself. And that goes back to something I think most people here would be opposed to: jailing people in order to make money. Now it will be throwing people in mandatory rehab in order to make money. Let's not forget that the teenager who tries one joint and gets caught will be treated exactly the same as a 20 year dope fiend. This is not about helping people; it's about helping himself to our money.
