Fake News

[Speaker to Animals]

FAKE NEWS fail! Another CNN Trump ‘bombshell’ explodes in their faces

CNN reported exclusively that Donald Trump Jr. tweeted about Hillary Clinton and Wikileaks on the same day he supposedly was sent info by Wikileaks, which CNN said was September 4th. CNN had “bombshell” on the brain.

The linked Twitchy piece gives the dope in simple twitter format.

Time travel once again ^^^

[Fife]

[Fife]

Greenwald gives it to CNN, NBC, CBS pretty firm, and he's not exactly Breitbart, you know:

The U.S. Media Yesterday Suffered its Most Humiliating Debacle in Ages: Now Refuses All Transparency Over What Happened

FRIDAY WAS ONE of the most embarrassing days for the U.S. media in quite a long time. The humiliation orgy was kicked off by CNN, with MSNBC and CBS close behind, with countless pundits, commentators and operatives joining the party throughout the day. By the end of the day, it was clear that several of the nation’s largest and most influential news outlets had spread an explosive but completely false news story to millions of people, while refusing to provide any explanation of how it happened.

. . .

At minimum, these networks – CNN, MSNBC and CBS – have to either identify who purposely fed them this blatantly false information, or explain how it’s possible that “multiple sources” all got the same information wrong in innocence and good faith. Until they do that, their cries and protests the next time they’re attacked as “Fake News” should fall on deaf ears, since the real author of those attacks – the reason those attacks resonate – is themselves and their own conduct.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Greenwald gives it to CNN, NBC, CBS pretty firm, and he's not exactly Breitbart, you know:

The U.S. Media Yesterday Suffered its Most Humiliating Debacle in Ages: Now Refuses All Transparency Over What Happened

FRIDAY WAS ONE of the most embarrassing days for the U.S. media in quite a long time. The humiliation orgy was kicked off by CNN, with MSNBC and CBS close behind, with countless pundits, commentators and operatives joining the party throughout the day. By the end of the day, it was clear that several of the nation’s largest and most influential news outlets had spread an explosive but completely false news story to millions of people, while refusing to provide any explanation of how it happened.

. . .

At minimum, these networks – CNN, MSNBC and CBS – have to either identify who purposely fed them this blatantly false information, or explain how it’s possible that “multiple sources” all got the same information wrong in innocence and good faith. Until they do that, their cries and protests the next time they’re attacked as “Fake News” should fall on deaf ears, since the real author of those attacks – the reason those attacks resonate – is themselves and their own conduct.

Non-zero chance that this was an intelligence op.

Wouldn’t be hard to plant a couple of Reuters reporters into the news feed, and put out fake stories. All of the networks just regurgitate whatever comes across the wire. They don’t do their own “reporting”.

Discreting the media is a key step in destabilizing a country.

[Speaker to Animals]

Greenwald gives it to CNN, NBC, CBS pretty firm, and he's not exactly Breitbart, you know:

The U.S. Media Yesterday Suffered its Most Humiliating Debacle in Ages: Now Refuses All Transparency Over What Happened

FRIDAY WAS ONE of the most embarrassing days for the U.S. media in quite a long time. The humiliation orgy was kicked off by CNN, with MSNBC and CBS close behind, with countless pundits, commentators and operatives joining the party throughout the day. By the end of the day, it was clear that several of the nation’s largest and most influential news outlets had spread an explosive but completely false news story to millions of people, while refusing to provide any explanation of how it happened.

. . .

At minimum, these networks – CNN, MSNBC and CBS – have to either identify who purposely fed them this blatantly false information, or explain how it’s possible that “multiple sources” all got the same information wrong in innocence and good faith. Until they do that, their cries and protests the next time they’re attacked as “Fake News” should fall on deaf ears, since the real author of those attacks – the reason those attacks resonate – is themselves and their own conduct.

Non-zero chance that this was an intelligence op.

Wouldn’t be hard to plant a couple of Reuters reporters into the news feed, and put out fake stories. All of the networks just regurgitate whatever comes across the wire. They don’t do their own “reporting”.

Discreting the media is a key step in destabilizing a country.

There's a fairly large non-zero probability that the MSM in general is controlled by the IC. As in.. a 1.0 probability.

[BjornP]

Greenwald gives it to CNN, NBC, CBS pretty firm, and he's not exactly Breitbart, you know:

The U.S. Media Yesterday Suffered its Most Humiliating Debacle in Ages: Now Refuses All Transparency Over What Happened

Non-zero chance that this was an intelligence op.

Wouldn’t be hard to plant a couple of Reuters reporters into the news feed, and put out fake stories. All of the networks just regurgitate whatever comes across the wire. They don’t do their own “reporting”.

Discreting the media is a key step in destabilizing a country.

There's a fairly large non-zero probability that the MSM in general is controlled by the IC. As in.. a 1.0 probability.

"The IC" is a little vague... Anyone in (who is in a leadership position) in particular?

[Okeefenokee]

Non-zero chance that this was an intelligence op.

Wouldn’t be hard to plant a couple of Reuters reporters into the news feed, and put out fake stories. All of the networks just regurgitate whatever comes across the wire. They don’t do their own “reporting”.

Discreting the media is a key step in destabilizing a country.

There's a fairly large non-zero probability that the MSM in general is controlled by the IC. As in.. a 1.0 probability.

"The IC" is a little vague... Anyone in (who is in a leadership position) in particular?

Anderson Cooper worked(s) for the CIA.

[Speaker to Animals]

Non-zero chance that this was an intelligence op.

Wouldn’t be hard to plant a couple of Reuters reporters into the news feed, and put out fake stories. All of the networks just regurgitate whatever comes across the wire. They don’t do their own “reporting”.

Discreting the media is a key step in destabilizing a country.

There's a fairly large non-zero probability that the MSM in general is controlled by the IC. As in.. a 1.0 probability.

"The IC" is a little vague... Anyone in (who is in a leadership position) in particular?

For some time now, most of the MSM journalists have worked either directly or indirectly with the intelligence community. This has been going on since the 1970s. The CIA was exposed as having many of the top journalists directly on their payroll.

How do you think shit like the Iraqi yellow cake stories get published or all the "anonymous" reports used in all their stories? The MSM is FAKE FAKE FAKE. News flash. LOL

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-03-2 ... ll-lie-cia

http://carlbernstein.com/magazine_cia_and_media.php


I have worked indirectly for those guys. I like the CIA, honestly. I don't blame them for doing this type of shit because they *can* get away with it and it furthers their mission. But somewhere during the Obama administration, a faction within the IC began to use the apparatus for the political goals of the democratic party, and these people ought to be exposed and removed from those positions of influence and power. Furthermore, just in terms of journalistic integrity, ALL of these MSM hacks deserve to be exposed.

[Speaker to Animals]

Here's a good example of how it works in our current time with respect to that fake dossier with all the ridiculous allegations about Trump hiring prostitutes to piss on a bed in Russia..

The dossier was commissioned in part by the intelligence community (primarily the intelligence end of the FBI) when the Hillary Clinton and the DNC stopped paying for it.

The dossier itself was fabricated by ex-intelligence employees with continuing deep ties to the IC (Steele).

The information was leaked to the media and CNN opened the door for reporting on the fake news as if it were a fact. But CNN failed to disclose that CNN itself is quite connected to Fusion GPS, http://dailycaller.com/2017/10/28/cnns- ... usion-gps/

People need to realize that quite a lot of this fake intelligence used to create fake news for political aims is fabricated by these private intelligence groups which are, in fact, a "fusion" of MSM and intelligence former employees. It's designed to create fake news stories based on "anonymous sources" and "intelligence reports" all based on lies. Nobody in that chain is unaware that this is totally fake news. They are in the business of propaganda and lies. The intelligence assets I can understand to some extent when their motives are not American politics but actually foreign intelligence and disrupting/influencing foreign politics. That's literally their job. The journalists who do this are dishonest, in my opinion, and I wouldn't lose sleep over them being exposed. When they target the American people with these lies, ALL of these people ought to be exposed for what they are. They are using the IC apparatus to undermine the American democratic process. It's borderline treason.

[SuburbanFarmer]

There's a fairly large non-zero probability that the MSM in general is controlled by the IC. As in.. a 1.0 probability.

"The IC" is a little vague... Anyone in (who is in a leadership position) in particular?

For some time now, most of the MSM journalists have worked either directly or indirectly with the intelligence community. This has been going on since the 1970s. The CIA was exposed as having many of the top journalists directly on their payroll.

How do you think shit like the Iraqi yellow cake stories get published or all the "anonymous" reports used in all their stories? The MSM is FAKE FAKE FAKE. News flash. LOL

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-03-2 ... ll-lie-cia

http://carlbernstein.com/magazine_cia_and_media.php


I have worked indirectly for those guys. I like the CIA, honestly. I don't blame them for doing this type of shit because they *can* get away with it and it furthers their mission. But somewhere during the Obama administration, a faction within the IC began to use the apparatus for the political goals of the democratic party, and these people ought to be exposed and removed from those positions of influence and power. Furthermore, just in terms of journalistic integrity, ALL of these MSM hacks deserve to be exposed.

No chance at all that they’re doing the same thing for Republicans then. Putting out absurd and easily countered stories, I guess.

Your bias is showing.