Net Neutrality

User avatar
pineapplemike
Posts: 4652
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by pineapplemike »

What guarantees do we have that the government will keep the internet neutral and unrestricted to users?
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Speaker to Animals »

pineapplemike wrote:What guarantees do we have that the government will keep the internet neutral and unrestricted to users?

The certainty that you will get fucked right in the ass by Comcast if we deregulate.
Last edited by Speaker to Animals on Fri Nov 24, 2017 3:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25408
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by SuburbanFarmer »

Speaker to Animals wrote:
pineapplemike wrote:What guarantees do we have that the government will keep the internet neutral and unrestricted to users?

The certainty that you will get fucked right in the ads by Comcast if we detegulate.
This. At least we have some superficial control over the government.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Speaker to Animals »

I swear to God, I typed that correctly and Android just fucking makes it wrong.
Penner
Posts: 3350
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:00 pm

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Penner »

pineapplemike wrote:What guarantees do we have that the government will keep the internet neutral and unrestricted to users?
I am on my phone now but I cam repost (later) an article that shows what a country that never had the protection we have with NN. I posted that article in the Era of Trump thread since Ajit Pai, the current FCC chairman that Trump appointed, wants to take NN awayvwith the Dec vote. He also wanted to do this way back in the summer as well.
Image
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Speaker to Animals »

Nations with regulated internet access have the most advanced and highest broadband speeds in the world. The less regulation, and the more monopolization, the worse it is.


This is macroeconomics 101, guys. I am serious. You should have learned this as a sophomore.

Monopolistic powers are pretty fucking bad for consumers and the entire nation in general. Come on.
User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14805
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by The Conservative »

pineapplemike wrote:Are hard lines necessary to provide internet access?
No, and satellite (line of sight) internet has been getting faster. To the point, they are blowing away fiber.
#NotOneRedCent
User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25408
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by SuburbanFarmer »

The Conservative wrote:
pineapplemike wrote:Are hard lines necessary to provide internet access?
No, and satellite (line of sight) internet has been getting faster. To the point, they are blowing away fiber.
Hardly.

Unless you’ve got a satellite dedicated exclusively to your house, no.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Speaker to Animals »

Sat cannot compete at all. That's what people use up in the mountains around here. It's really fucking bad, actually. Not consistent at all. You cannot possibly compare that to broadband.
User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14805
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by The Conservative »

Speaker to Animals wrote:Sat cannot compete at all. That's what people use up in the mountains around here. It's really fucking bad, actually. Not consistent at all. You cannot possibly compare that to broadband.
http://www.tested.com/tech/2364-how-a-l ... er-second/
#NotOneRedCent