DBTrek wrote:Well, if that's the case (and I wouldn't know), then lying under oath is lying under oath. Book 'em, Dano.Speaker to Animals wrote:If the man lies in family court, for any reason, he is getting handcuffed and going to jail for at least thirty days. If he lied under oath, he is getting charged with a crime.
I've been there. The double standard is so wide open it's really beyond belief. Out here in the rest of society, the double standard is pretty apparent, but it's mostly an annoyance for most men.
/shrug
God, I really wish that were the case. I am all for holding people accountable for that type of thing, but it's not going to happen. "Holding accountable" only happens to men for the most part, and by holding accountable, it's usually being locked in a cage for manufactured debts he cannot reasonably or even possibly pay.
Some districts might be a lot better about these things, but I wouldn't count on it anywhere around Seattle. Honestly, if I were married with kids right now, I'd be trying to find a way to move far away from any democratic party-controlled family court systems just in case.
