Can't wait to be recognized as the first communist with a Chicago school interpretation of economics. Truly breaking all barriers these days.
Are you sure you would be the first?
To be a communist you kind of need to subscribe to the marxist school of economics that puts suppliers and consumers at conflict with one another rather than as human “organisms” trying to reach an optimal bundle of satisfaction.
Seems kind of odd to be a communist yet subscribe to an economic system that implies a level of cooperation between people and businesses, don’t you think?
Can't wait to be recognized as the first communist with a Chicago school interpretation of economics. Truly breaking all barriers these days.
Are you sure you would be the first?
To be a communist you kind of need to subscribe to the marxist school of economics that puts suppliers and consumers at conflict with one another rather than as human “organisms” trying to reach an optimal bundle of satisfaction.
Seems kind of odd to be a communist yet subscribe to an economic system that implies a level of cooperation between people and businesses, don’t you think?
You just described the Frankfurt School of Politics. Literally Marxist.
The original aim of critical theory was to analyze the true significance of "the ruling understandings" generated in bourgeois society, in order to show how they misrepresented actual human interaction in the real world, and in so doing functioned to justify or legitimize the domination of people by capitalism.
Let's make sure everyone has fresh coffee and/or fruit smothies on the ramp up to the free tour-bird. Or even McBagels. Nothing but the best for our guests.
Actually I'm looking up Chicago School of Economics and I have no idea wtf they are on about so just ignore me. I don't typically associate Chicago with anything other than failing leftist policies and have no strong interest in economic science tbqh
There’s a huge difference between schools of social thought and schools of economics. One tends to focus on addressing wide ranging social issues and questions like “is [blank] a necessary part of capitalism?” while the other attempts to create mathematical models in order to address how individuals/organizations react in certain conditions.
You can’t take what I’m talking about and apply it to the Frankfurt school of thought.
Leftist policies? Nah, not in econ. It’s Stanford + Chicago monetarism against Yale + Harvard + MIT keynesians. Or at least it was; econ has become less divided with the introduction of neokeynesian thought but we’re still more “free market” than the saltwater schools.
Heraclius wrote:There’s a huge difference between schools of social thought and schools of economics. One tends to focus on addressing wide ranging social issues and questions like “is [blank] a necessary part of capitalism?” while the other attempts to create mathematical models in order to address how individuals/organizations react in certain conditions.
You can’t take what I’m talking about and apply it to the Frankfurt school of thought.
Leftist policies? Nah, not in econ. It’s Stanford + Chicago monetarism against Yale + Harvard + MIT keynesians. Or at least it was; econ has become less divided with the introduction of neokeynesian thought but we’re still more “free market” than the saltwater schools.
This guy needs to suck a dick, how is that for "protein diversity?"
