Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz

Post by clubgop » Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:23 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:22 pm
Do you want to have conversations with me or do you want to go back on ignore?
I've given you a chance but if you are just going back to the same old shit I won't bother.
I wouldn't want to burden you with too much posting. It might be too much like work.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18695
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz

Post by Montegriffo » Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:30 pm

clubgop wrote:
Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:23 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:22 pm
Do you want to have conversations with me or do you want to go back on ignore?
I've given you a chance but if you are just going back to the same old shit I won't bother.
I wouldn't want to burden you with too much posting. It might be too much like work.
It's not work when I enjoy it. If it is just abuse for the sake of abuse I can't be bothered.
There's a reason that there are so few of us left. In 3 days time I will have known you lot for exactly 4 years. Why you have to treat some people the way you do still eludes me.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz

Post by clubgop » Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:54 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:30 pm
clubgop wrote:
Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:23 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:22 pm
Do you want to have conversations with me or do you want to go back on ignore?
I've given you a chance but if you are just going back to the same old shit I won't bother.
I wouldn't want to burden you with too much posting. It might be too much like work.
It's not work when I enjoy it. If it is just abuse for the sake of abuse I can't be bothered.
There's a reason that there are so few of us left. In 3 days time I will have known you lot for exactly 4 years. Why you have to treat some people the way you do still eludes me.
This was a refuge. We were cast out from Eden. People leaving here isn't a failure, it is an evolution. You want people to abandon family obligations to save the Earth and this forum. That's going to be a hard no, dog.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18695
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz

Post by Montegriffo » Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:02 pm

clubgop wrote:
Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:54 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:30 pm
clubgop wrote:
Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:23 pm


I wouldn't want to burden you with too much posting. It might be too much like work.
It's not work when I enjoy it. If it is just abuse for the sake of abuse I can't be bothered.
There's a reason that there are so few of us left. In 3 days time I will have known you lot for exactly 4 years. Why you have to treat some people the way you do still eludes me.
This was a refuge. We were cast out from Eden. People leaving here isn't a failure, it is an evolution. You want people to abandon family obligations to save the Earth and this forum. That's going to be a hard no, dog.
No. I'd like people to change their habits and reduce their excessive consumerism.
I don't have dependents and have a simple life so it is easier for me but everyone can do their bit.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Haumana
Posts: 4027
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:48 am

Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz

Post by Haumana » Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:09 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Sat Jan 11, 2020 6:31 pm
Haumana wrote:
Sat Jan 11, 2020 6:07 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Sat Jan 11, 2020 5:41 pm


Well, excuse me for going to bed at 5.40am without answering your same question in a different form.
The point is to pass the costs on to the consumer. That's the whole point. The polluter pays.
Excuse you? You answered a few other posts since mine. #victimcard noted

That wasn't the point you started on. Your point was to tax the producer. That you can't name one tax that doesn't involve a credit or exception is also noted. So the average joe is the polluter, in your mind, and not the ebil corporations?
The conversation moves on. Some posts get left behind.
Of course the consumer is the polluter. Who else could it be?
As for credits or exceptions, fuck that. The polluter pays, no exceptions.
Tax the producers, they reduce emissions to outcompete or they pass it on and perish.
Want to avoid carbon tax? Reduce your consumption.
I lived off about £5k last year. Jobs are jails.
So nothing. Got it. Just own it instead of pretending.

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz

Post by clubgop » Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:10 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:02 pm
clubgop wrote:
Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:54 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:30 pm


It's not work when I enjoy it. If it is just abuse for the sake of abuse I can't be bothered.
There's a reason that there are so few of us left. In 3 days time I will have known you lot for exactly 4 years. Why you have to treat some people the way you do still eludes me.
This was a refuge. We were cast out from Eden. People leaving here isn't a failure, it is an evolution. You want people to abandon family obligations to save the Earth and this forum. That's going to be a hard no, dog.
No. I'd like people to change their habits and reduce their excessive consumerism.
I don't have dependents and have a simple life so it is easier for me but everyone can do their bit.
So we go back about a couple decades. No thanks.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18695
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz

Post by Montegriffo » Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:44 pm

Haumana wrote:
Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:09 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Sat Jan 11, 2020 6:31 pm
Haumana wrote:
Sat Jan 11, 2020 6:07 pm


Excuse you? You answered a few other posts since mine. #victimcard noted

That wasn't the point you started on. Your point was to tax the producer. That you can't name one tax that doesn't involve a credit or exception is also noted. So the average joe is the polluter, in your mind, and not the ebil corporations?
The conversation moves on. Some posts get left behind.
Of course the consumer is the polluter. Who else could it be?
As for credits or exceptions, fuck that. The polluter pays, no exceptions.
Tax the producers, they reduce emissions to outcompete or they pass it on and perish.
Want to avoid carbon tax? Reduce your consumption.
I lived off about £5k last year. Jobs are jails.
So nothing. Got it. Just own it instead of pretending.
Is that an argument?
Am I pretending to have an opinion? It's not very clear what you are saying. I've outlined what I think is a possible way to reduce CO2 output.
How would you suggest we do it?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz

Post by clubgop » Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:01 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:44 pm
Haumana wrote:
Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:09 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Sat Jan 11, 2020 6:31 pm


The conversation moves on. Some posts get left behind.
Of course the consumer is the polluter. Who else could it be?
As for credits or exceptions, fuck that. The polluter pays, no exceptions.
Tax the producers, they reduce emissions to outcompete or they pass it on and perish.
Want to avoid carbon tax? Reduce your consumption.
I lived off about £5k last year. Jobs are jails.
So nothing. Got it. Just own it instead of pretending.
Is that an argument?
Am I pretending to have an opinion? It's not very clear what you are saying. I've outlined what I think is a possible way to reduce CO2 output.
How would you suggest we do it?
You think living at 50% below the poverty line is a remote possibility?

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18695
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz

Post by Montegriffo » Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:21 pm

clubgop wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:01 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:44 pm
Haumana wrote:
Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:09 pm


So nothing. Got it. Just own it instead of pretending.
Is that an argument?
Am I pretending to have an opinion? It's not very clear what you are saying. I've outlined what I think is a possible way to reduce CO2 output.
How would you suggest we do it?
You think living at 50% below the poverty line is a remote possibility?
I think I've proved it.
Standard of living is often just another way of saying materialism.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz

Post by clubgop » Sun Jan 12, 2020 7:19 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:21 pm
clubgop wrote:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:01 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:44 pm


Is that an argument?
Am I pretending to have an opinion? It's not very clear what you are saying. I've outlined what I think is a possible way to reduce CO2 output.
How would you suggest we do it?
You think living at 50% below the poverty line is a remote possibility?
I think I've proved it.
Standard of living is often just another way of saying materialism.
:lol: Tell that to the socialist.