Solar Filter
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Solar Filter
What if you took 5% mirror Crome tint layered thrice, it would allow .0125 of light through.
Reflective solar filters allow .01% of light through. If my math is correct that is, I believe I may have found a cheaper way to get a filter. Of course just as effective. At 1/50th the price.
Reflective solar filters allow .01% of light through. If my math is correct that is, I believe I may have found a cheaper way to get a filter. Of course just as effective. At 1/50th the price.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: Solar Filter
Show the maths. I think it's going to be 95x95x95 filtration not 95+95+95 jic you aren't aware. I might be wrong though. I guess adding percentages is the same thing maybe though.
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Solar Filter
.05 is what goes through. Not 95%Nukedog wrote:Show the maths. I think it's going to be 95x95x95 filtration not 95+95+95 jic you aren't aware. I might be wrong though. I guess adding percentages is the same thing maybe though.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: Solar Filter
So is it .05/.05/.05 or...
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: Solar Filter
Oh I see I forgot to multiply. How is 5% mirror chrome .05? Is it because of the mirror?
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Solar Filter
You'd get 0.045% out of it.
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Solar Filter
How do you get that? .05x.05x.05 = 0.000125Speaker to Animals wrote:You'd get 0.045% out of it.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Solar Filter
The Conservative wrote:How do you get that? .05x.05x.05 = 0.000125Speaker to Animals wrote:You'd get 0.045% out of it.
You are multiplying the wrong things.
95% filtered from 100% leaves you with 5%.
95% of 5% is: .05 * .95 = 0.0475%
95% of 0.0475% is: 0.0475 * .95 = 0.045125%.
If you stacked three filters that filter out 95%, you'd filter out all but 0.045125% of the light, which may be okay depending upon your aperture and shutter speed settings (I don't really know about that). I am just straightening out your calculations.
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Solar Filter
Times three?Speaker to Animals wrote:The Conservative wrote:How do you get that? .05x.05x.05 = 0.000125Speaker to Animals wrote:You'd get 0.045% out of it.
You are multiplying the wrong things.
95% filtered from 100% leaves you with 5%.
95% of 5% is: .05 * .95 = 0.0475%
95% of 0.0475% is: 0.0475 * .95 = 0.045125%.
If you stacked three filters that filter out 95%, you'd filter out all but 0.045125% of the light, which may be okay depending upon your aperture and shutter speed settings (I don't really know about that). I am just straightening out your calculations.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Solar Filter
No.The Conservative wrote:Times three?Speaker to Animals wrote:The Conservative wrote:
How do you get that? .05x.05x.05 = 0.000125
You are multiplying the wrong things.
95% filtered from 100% leaves you with 5%.
95% of 5% is: .05 * .95 = 0.0475%
95% of 0.0475% is: 0.0475 * .95 = 0.045125%.
If you stacked three filters that filter out 95%, you'd filter out all but 0.045125% of the light, which may be okay depending upon your aperture and shutter speed settings (I don't really know about that). I am just straightening out your calculations.
Each subsequent filter receives a smaller amount of light since they are serially arranged with a single input transmitted in sequence.
If X is the initial amount of light:
((.95 * X) * .95) * .95)