Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18695
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)

Post by Montegriffo » Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:34 am

It's just a way of airing your dirty laundry in public isn't it?
It's like a court with a jury biased in favour of the defendant.
It might swing a few undecided voters and that's about it.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14719
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)

Post by The Conservative » Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:44 am

StCapps wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 6:50 am
The Conservative wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 6:37 am
StCapps wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 6:30 am
He missed interesting conversation, looking for boring impeachment conversation.
Then create your own hockey topic, don't need derail a legitimate and relevant topic.
It is not legitimate or relevant. It's people arguing in circles, adding nothing of value, aside from trolling other forum members, and the last five pages are better than any of the trolling done in all the previous pages combined. If you want to go back to repeating yourself over and over again, ad nauseam, knock yourself out, but don't pretend that is somehow riveting content and this thread is precious, because it's fucking not. This thread being derailed was infinitely more entertaining than this thread "on the rails".
Hockey puck = round.

There is your circular argument.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18695
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)

Post by Montegriffo » Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:09 am

The Conservative wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:44 am
StCapps wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 6:50 am
The Conservative wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 6:37 am


Then create your own hockey topic, don't need derail a legitimate and relevant topic.
It is not legitimate or relevant. It's people arguing in circles, adding nothing of value, aside from trolling other forum members, and the last five pages are better than any of the trolling done in all the previous pages combined. If you want to go back to repeating yourself over and over again, ad nauseam, knock yourself out, but don't pretend that is somehow riveting content and this thread is precious, because it's fucking not. This thread being derailed was infinitely more entertaining than this thread "on the rails".
Hockey puck = round.

There is your circular argument.
Kinda weakens your argument about staying on topic if you are just going to get into a spatt with repeatobot about staying on topic.
Enlighten us on your latest thoughts about the impeachment if you want the thread to stay on topic.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)

Post by StCapps » Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:11 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:09 am
The Conservative wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:44 am
StCapps wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 6:50 am
It is not legitimate or relevant. It's people arguing in circles, adding nothing of value, aside from trolling other forum members, and the last five pages are better than any of the trolling done in all the previous pages combined. If you want to go back to repeating yourself over and over again, ad nauseam, knock yourself out, but don't pretend that is somehow riveting content and this thread is precious, because it's fucking not. This thread being derailed was infinitely more entertaining than this thread "on the rails".
Hockey puck = round.

There is your circular argument.
Kinda weakens your argument about staying on topic if you are just going to get into a spatt with repeatobot about staying on topic.
Enlighten us on your latest thoughts about the impeachment if you want the thread to stay on topic.
Produce interesting content or the thread will go off topic, who knew?
*yip*

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14719
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)

Post by The Conservative » Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:14 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:09 am
The Conservative wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:44 am
StCapps wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 6:50 am
It is not legitimate or relevant. It's people arguing in circles, adding nothing of value, aside from trolling other forum members, and the last five pages are better than any of the trolling done in all the previous pages combined. If you want to go back to repeating yourself over and over again, ad nauseam, knock yourself out, but don't pretend that is somehow riveting content and this thread is precious, because it's fucking not. This thread being derailed was infinitely more entertaining than this thread "on the rails".
Hockey puck = round.

There is your circular argument.
Kinda weakens your argument about staying on topic if you are just going to get into a spatt with repeatobot about staying on topic.
Enlighten us on your latest thoughts about the impeachment if you want the thread to stay on topic.
It was tongue in cheek humor, something well above your intellect or pay-grade, go back to being beaten by English Wenches and you'll be safe.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)

Post by StCapps » Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:23 am

The Conservative wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:14 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:09 am
The Conservative wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:44 am

Hockey puck = round.

There is your circular argument.
Kinda weakens your argument about staying on topic if you are just going to get into a spatt with repeatobot about staying on topic.
Enlighten us on your latest thoughts about the impeachment if you want the thread to stay on topic.
It was tongue in cheek humor, something well above your intellect or pay-grade, go back to being beaten by English Wenches and you'll be safe.
It was a lame dad joke at best.
/shrugs
*yip*

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18695
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)

Post by Montegriffo » Fri Nov 22, 2019 10:16 am

The Conservative wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:14 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:09 am
The Conservative wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:44 am

Hockey puck = round.

There is your circular argument.
Kinda weakens your argument about staying on topic if you are just going to get into a spatt with repeatobot about staying on topic.
Enlighten us on your latest thoughts about the impeachment if you want the thread to stay on topic.
It was tongue in cheek humor, something well above your intellect or pay-grade, go back to being beaten by English Wenches and you'll be safe.
I never saw that punch coming, total sucker punch.
Didn't hold it against her, the opposite really. Nothing wrong with a bit of spirit in your totty.
It was the rows about politics which killed the relationship in the end. She was smart though, could have an intelligent conversation with her in just about any topic.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14719
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)

Post by The Conservative » Fri Nov 22, 2019 10:17 am

StCapps wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:23 am
The Conservative wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:14 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:09 am


Kinda weakens your argument about staying on topic if you are just going to get into a spatt with repeatobot about staying on topic.
Enlighten us on your latest thoughts about the impeachment if you want the thread to stay on topic.
It was tongue in cheek humor, something well above your intellect or pay-grade, go back to being beaten by English Wenches and you'll be safe.
It was a lame dad joke at best.
/shrugs
I'm a dad. So I'll take what I can get.
#NotOneRedCent

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)

Post by Smitty-48 » Fri Nov 22, 2019 11:03 am

PartyOf5 wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 5:58 am
Good job. All of that is sure to bring more participation to this forum than the 4-5 who are left.
Quit your whining and get lost already, take your MSM talking points and go.
Nec Aspera Terrent

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)

Post by Smitty-48 » Fri Nov 22, 2019 11:12 am

StCapps wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:11 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:09 am
The Conservative wrote:
Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:44 am

Hockey puck = round.

There is your circular argument.
Kinda weakens your argument about staying on topic if you are just going to get into a spatt with repeatobot about staying on topic.
Enlighten us on your latest thoughts about the impeachment if you want the thread to stay on topic.
Produce interesting content or the thread will go off topic, who knew?
If they're not talking about Marty Hash, they're off topic anyways,

Technically, this forum is about and for the promotion of Martin Hash Esq.

The DCF Refugee area was just a lifeboat, after Nukedog sunk the DCF

There was never any mandate here to do anything but keep in touch.

Moreover, this is what the DCF was like, thread jacking was what the DCF was all about.

Who the fuck is PartyOf5? I don't even remember this tool being on the DCF

If this is perpetuating the DCF, I'm Smitty-48, who the fucks are these clowns here?
Nec Aspera Terrent