William Barr > Charlemenge

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18692
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: William Barr > Charlemenge

Post by Montegriffo » Sat Apr 06, 2019 4:59 am

Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top
User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: William Barr > Charlemenge

Post by StCapps » Sat Apr 06, 2019 5:00 am

Montegriffo wrote: ↑
Sat Apr 06, 2019 4:58 am
 Image
What are you going to say, once the report is released? "Some of it is still redacted, the smoking gun must still be in there somewhere, despite both Barr and Mueller saying it isn't.", that's my bet.

Guilty until proven innocent, Demohacks will never let it go.
*yip*
Top
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18692
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: William Barr > Charlemenge

Post by Montegriffo » Sat Apr 06, 2019 5:05 am

Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18692
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: William Barr > Charlemenge

Post by Montegriffo » Sat Apr 06, 2019 5:10 am

Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top
User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: William Barr > Charlemenge

Post by StCapps » Sat Apr 06, 2019 5:19 am

This is what cognitive dissonance looks like. Troll away monte.
*yip*
Top
User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: William Barr > Charlemenge

Post by StCapps » Sat Apr 06, 2019 5:21 am

Montegriffo wrote: ↑
Sat Apr 06, 2019 5:05 am
 Image
The Democrats set that bar, not Barr. Now they are moving the goalposts.
*yip*
Top
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: William Barr > Charlemenge

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Apr 06, 2019 5:22 am

Also disgusting hypocrisy. Imagine what people like Monty would say if you sexually mocked a female politician like that. These people are truly degenerate filth.
Top
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18692
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: William Barr > Charlemenge

Post by Montegriffo » Sat Apr 06, 2019 5:32 am

Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: William Barr > Charlemenge

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Apr 06, 2019 5:54 am

How do you prove a negative, Monty?

The scene that comes to my mind was towards the end of McArthy's hearings where somebody pointed out to him that there is no proof that this person was a communist, and McArthy's reply was: "but there is no proof he is not a communist".

https://www.fallacyfiles.org/ignorant.html


This is a frightening reign of terror mentality, man.
Top
User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: William Barr > Charlemenge

Post by clubgop » Sat Apr 06, 2019 6:33 am

See? Why should he get the benefit of the doubt? He'll never give it to you. He goes around making all these allegations without a shred of proof, but I am the bad guy for pointing out his child predatory behavior? If Monte wants I'll release an unredacted report for my two year "investigation" and we'll see how exonerated he feels.
Top

Return to “Current Events”