Brexit

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Brexit

Post by Montegriffo » Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:15 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Wed Jan 09, 2019 7:59 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Jan 09, 2019 7:49 am
Wow.
Making it harder for children to watch hardcore porn is prudish?
Is that the Pope's opinion too or do the Priests say children should be in porn not watching it?
It's not the government's role to make porn more difficult for children to watch. That's the role of parents.
Not the government's job to make laws against children drinking alcohol or driving cars. It is the sole responsibility of parents.
Derp
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Brexit

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:15 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:15 am


Not the government's job to make laws against children drinking alcohol or driving cars. It is the sole responsibility of parents.
Good point.

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Brexit

Post by Fife » Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:17 am

There's hope for Montez yet.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Brexit

Post by Montegriffo » Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:21 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:15 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:15 am


Not the government's job to make laws against children drinking alcohol or driving cars. It is the sole responsibility of parents.
Good point.
What if the parents are paedophiles or just terrible parents?

Fucking unbelievable that you all object to measures intended to make it harder for children to view porn.
What about hardcore gay porn? Should that be easy for pubescent children to watch too?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Brexit

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:25 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:21 am
Speaker to Animals wrote:
Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:15 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:15 am


Not the government's job to make laws against children drinking alcohol or driving cars. It is the sole responsibility of parents.
Good point.
What if the parents are paedophiles?
Image

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Brexit

Post by Fife » Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:31 am

Why can't we get us one of those Departments of the Internet like those English chaps?

User avatar
BjornP
Posts: 3360
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Brexit

Post by BjornP » Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:05 am



:o
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Brexit

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:17 am

BjornP wrote:
Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:05 am


:o
Over hyped unfortunately. I watched about half of it but found it a little tedious. No real insights into the process.
I might try again sometime but apart from some good acting from Benedict nothing much to recommend it for.

Very sad ending :(
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
BjornP
Posts: 3360
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Brexit

Post by BjornP » Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:21 am

I like how the trailer seems to make "mobilizing more voters" seem like some sort of great conspiracy. Very British. ;)
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18725
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Brexit

Post by Martin Hash » Thu Jan 10, 2019 11:40 am

There's certainly enough voters to be statistically accurate. "Mobilizing more voters" isn't going to change anything unless the "mobilized voters" are unrepresentative of the population; how democratic is that?!
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change