Trump Impeachment Hearing.

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Trump Impeachment Hearing.

Post by DBTrek » Fri Jan 15, 2021 1:06 pm

Martin Hash wrote:
Fri Jan 15, 2021 12:51 pm
Comparing Jesus to Stalin certainly is dramatic.

Like I said before: get ‘em during life or after-life for not being sufficiently egalitarian requires some hair-splitting to see the difference.
Ehhhh ... that theory kind of breaks down when you recognize the Christians, throughout history, have been among the poorest and most desperate of populations. Marxists obsess over wealth distribution because they want the real-world material value that the rich possess. But the Church isn't teaching "love your neighbor" and "feed the poor" because they want to fleece the impoverished masses searching for some hope and spiritual guidance. They're laying a moral foundation and value system that helps communities weather political and religious persecution. Marxism, on the other hand, acts directly opposite, and imposes political and religious persecution.

The argument strikes me as pretty close to "religion and science are the same because they both explain stuff".
Yet ... they're pretty much polar opposites.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25278
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Trump Impeachment Hearing.

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Fri Jan 15, 2021 1:09 pm

Image
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
TheOneX
Posts: 1291
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:16 pm

Re: Trump Impeachment Hearing.

Post by TheOneX » Fri Jan 15, 2021 3:49 pm

Martin Hash wrote:
Fri Jan 15, 2021 9:18 am
Let's be clear, the Commies won; I didn't read Machiavelli for nothing...
Your thoughts on this are clouded by where you live.

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Trump Impeachment Hearing.

Post by Martin Hash » Fri Jan 15, 2021 3:53 pm

TheOneX wrote:
Fri Jan 15, 2021 3:49 pm
Martin Hash wrote:
Fri Jan 15, 2021 9:18 am
Let's be clear, the Commies won; I didn't read Machiavelli for nothing...
Your thoughts on this are clouded by where you live.
I've said before that may be true?
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Trump Impeachment Hearing.

Post by C-Mag » Mon Feb 08, 2021 9:32 am

The Conservative wrote:
Wed Jan 13, 2021 7:25 am
https://www.c-span.org/event/?507879/ho ... dent-trump

The 25th amendment didn't work, so now they are trying to impeach him... again.

Rand Paul says Zero chance of conviction. I'm not so sure
https://www.dailywire.com/news/rand-pau ... an-hearing
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14790
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump Impeachment Hearing.

Post by The Conservative » Mon Feb 08, 2021 9:33 am

C-Mag wrote:
Mon Feb 08, 2021 9:32 am
The Conservative wrote:
Wed Jan 13, 2021 7:25 am
https://www.c-span.org/event/?507879/ho ... dent-trump

The 25th amendment didn't work, so now they are trying to impeach him... again.

Rand Paul says Zero chance of conviction. I'm not so sure
https://www.dailywire.com/news/rand-pau ... an-hearing
The conviction isn't what you need to worry about, it's the ability to keep him from running for office again. You don't need a super-majority for that.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Trump Impeachment Hearing.

Post by C-Mag » Mon Feb 08, 2021 10:12 am

Agreed, ending his ability to run is important, but it's only half about Trump.

The other half is having a conviction to confirm Trumpism is a radical dangerous ideology. Then you can go after anyone weed who voted for Trump
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14790
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump Impeachment Hearing.

Post by The Conservative » Mon Feb 08, 2021 10:26 am

C-Mag wrote:
Mon Feb 08, 2021 10:12 am
Agreed, ending his ability to run is important, but it's only half about Trump.

The other half is having a conviction to confirm Trumpism is a radical dangerous ideology. Then you can go after anyone weed who voted for Trump
It also leads to very dangerous precedence. In where anyone you don't agree with can be kept from running for office.
#NotOneRedCent

Ph64
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:34 pm

Re: Trump Impeachment Hearing.

Post by Ph64 » Mon Feb 08, 2021 10:32 am

The Conservative wrote:
Mon Feb 08, 2021 10:26 am
C-Mag wrote:
Mon Feb 08, 2021 10:12 am
Agreed, ending his ability to run is important, but it's only half about Trump.

The other half is having a conviction to confirm Trumpism is a radical dangerous ideology. Then you can go after anyone weed who voted for Trump
It also leads to very dangerous precedence. In where anyone you don't agree with can be kept from running for office.
It raises the question though - can you keep someone from running for office if they haven't been convicted of a crime? That's the dangerous part, if you can exclude them even if not convicted of anything then you can exclude anyone.
"People don't like to be meddled with. We tell them what to do, what to think, don't run, don't walk. We're in their homes and in their heads and we haven't the right. We're meddlesome."

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14790
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump Impeachment Hearing.

Post by The Conservative » Mon Feb 08, 2021 10:45 am

Ph64 wrote:
Mon Feb 08, 2021 10:32 am
The Conservative wrote:
Mon Feb 08, 2021 10:26 am
C-Mag wrote:
Mon Feb 08, 2021 10:12 am
Agreed, ending his ability to run is important, but it's only half about Trump.

The other half is having a conviction to confirm Trumpism is a radical dangerous ideology. Then you can go after anyone weed who voted for Trump
It also leads to very dangerous precedence. In where anyone you don't agree with can be kept from running for office.
It raises the question though - can you keep someone from running for office if they haven't been convicted of a crime? That's the dangerous part, if you can exclude them even if not convicted of anything then you can exclude anyone.
They are trying it with Trump, then they are going to go after the RNC leadership, such as Cruz, etc...
#NotOneRedCent