I doubt that. Your joke already revealed your bitch hack leanings. You know how the MSM operates and got caught making a joke about it.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:40 pmTC was definitely implying that a shooting would be staged to distract from the hearings.pineapplemike wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:27 pmif the impeachment started going south for the Democrats there would be a school shootingi'm outno way the school shooting was because of the impeachment hearings, get real
That's why I accused him of promoting conspiracy theories.
Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
It is hearsay you fucking moron. They have people with opinions on what Trump was thinking, and zero proof he was thinking what they though he was thinking, just pure speculation based on their own impressions, and the impressions of other people who also have no proof what he was thinking. It's high school level rumor mongering, at best.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 7:34 amWow, the sycophants have been well drilled to repeat the ''hearsay'' meme at every opportunity.
Still, a wall of denial is still a wall even if Mexico isn't paying for it.
You need to find other media sources for your information, because all the one's you trust suck balls.
Last edited by StCapps on Fri Nov 15, 2019 7:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
At work I'm not logged into my Google account, so it's the unfiltered version. Most days the first three or four sections are about Trump. The change was immediately noticeable.clubgop wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 2:48 pmWait, is Google news straight google news or is it specifically catered to the user? It may know your procluvities and feed you just that. Beware the bubble.PartyOf5 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:41 amI can tell how Day 1 went for the Democrats without even reading a single MSM story. Just look at the Google news headlines. Only 1 section devoted to impeachment, and the headlines are all over the place. It was a disaster for Dems. If things had gone even remotely well, or if there was some smoking gun produced yesterday, my entire Google news page would be filled with multiple sections containing articles about how "this is it!" or "Trump is worried".
This is just another Russia/Mueller failure. They sent this one to impeachment proceedings because they are running out of time. They knew they were going to go through the impeachment process even before they knew what it was they were going to try and impeach him on. This had to be done before the election in order to try and sucker the swing voters into thinking Trump is a crook like Nixon. This is nothing more than a campaign trick. I hope voters see this for what it is and call them out on it come November 2020.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
Hearsay is not a meme, it is a fundamental part of trial law, you stupid undercover hack bitch. Democrats are trying to deny basic constitutional rights and elements of a fair legal process to Republicans they wish to persecute. You want to say this is not a coup because Impeachment is in the Constitution but every step along the way in the process you have looked to circumvent and undermine every other part of the constitution and federal rules including federal rules of evidence when it comes to hearsay. If you had a gun you would summarily execute politicians you don't like.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 7:34 amWow, the sycophants have been well drilled to repeat the ''hearsay'' meme at every opportunity.
Still, a wall of denial is still a wall even if Mexico isn't paying for it.
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
Why you gotta deflect from Trump's bad behavior Monty?Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 4:22 pmEnglish apple pie recipes go back to the time of Chaucer. The 1381 recipe (see illustration at right) is the earliest known apple pie recipe in the world,[1] and lists the ingredients as good apples, good spices, figs, raisins and pears.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
Daycares beware!pineapplemike wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:49 pmMontegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:40 pmTC was definitely implying that a shooting would be staged to distract from the hearings.
That's why I accused him of promoting conspiracy theories.
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
Sucking balls may be how he gets his information. Although I'm not sure how much info a teenage boy would have on current events.StCapps wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 7:38 amIt is hearsay you fucking moron. They have people with opinions on what Trump was thinking, and zero proof he was thinking what they though he was thinking, just pure speculation based on their own impressions, and the impressions of other people who also have no proof what he was thinking. It's high school level rumor mongering, at best.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 7:34 amWow, the sycophants have been well drilled to repeat the ''hearsay'' meme at every opportunity.
Still, a wall of denial is still a wall even if Mexico isn't paying for it.
You need to find other media sources for your information, because all the one's you trust suck balls.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
QEDStCapps wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 7:38 amIt is hearsay you fucking moron. They have people with opinions on what Trump was thinking, and zero proof he was thinking what they though he was thinking, just pure speculation based on their own impressions, and the impressions of other people who also have no proof what he was thinking. It's high school level rumor mongering, at best.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 7:34 amWow, the sycophants have been well drilled to repeat the ''hearsay'' meme at every opportunity.
Still, a wall of denial is still a wall even if Mexico isn't paying for it.
You need to find other media sources for your information, because all the one's you trust suck balls.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
It is important to remember that impeachment is a political process, not a judicial process. The rules of evidence don't (necessarily) apply. The due process that an officer is to receive regarding keeping his office is defined by the procedural rules, such as they are, found in the constitution and in Congress' lawful rules.
"I have received information from a whistleblower whose identity I claim not to know and other staff members that there have been some overheard conversations related to admissions made by a certain person about having a penchant for diddling young boys" is not admissible evidence before a grand jury, a trial, or any judicial hearing. At a political shit-show, however, that sort of stuff can go center stage. Of course, just because it's admitted into the record doesn't mean that a Congressman/Senator voting on impeachment/removal has to give it any weight (or maybe negative weight).
If anybody wants a lesson on political will, just wait to see what happens if the Senate decides to have a secret vote on removal.
"I have received information from a whistleblower whose identity I claim not to know and other staff members that there have been some overheard conversations related to admissions made by a certain person about having a penchant for diddling young boys" is not admissible evidence before a grand jury, a trial, or any judicial hearing. At a political shit-show, however, that sort of stuff can go center stage. Of course, just because it's admitted into the record doesn't mean that a Congressman/Senator voting on impeachment/removal has to give it any weight (or maybe negative weight).
If anybody wants a lesson on political will, just wait to see what happens if the Senate decides to have a secret vote on removal.
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
#NotOneRedCent