-
JohnDonne
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:06 am
Post
by JohnDonne » Sun May 13, 2018 3:55 pm
Fife wrote: ↑Sun May 13, 2018 3:46 pm
JohnDonne wrote: ↑Sun May 13, 2018 3:34 pm
One wonders what percentage of openly gay scout leaders molest boys verse straight identifying scout leaders. If less, it would mean your children would be statistically safer with openly gay men than with any self identifying straight men.
WTF is "verse?"
Can someone gib dis "verse" en Ingles?
If it has something to do with the preference of fathers, no sensible father would hand his son over to an openly gay scout leader.
I’m talking about scout leaders that write poems about young boys.
But really, what would your “sensible father” say if it turned out he was endangering his son by insisting only “straight” men lead him in a scout troop? Change of heart or double down on prejudice?
And it’s not a very hypothetical question, there’s probably a study out there with an answer.
-
Fife
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Post
by Fife » Sun May 13, 2018 4:01 pm
You're right that it's not a hypothetical question. You're wrong if you think any sane father would GAF about "probably a study."
-
JohnDonne
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:06 am
Post
by JohnDonne » Sun May 13, 2018 4:05 pm
Fife wrote: ↑Sun May 13, 2018 4:01 pm
You're right that it's not a hypothetical question. You're wrong if you think any sane father would GAF about "probably a study."
So you’re not even going to pretend to be rationally prejudiced, just full blown irrational, and you’re satisfied with that?
Data is useful when it suits your biases tho, amirite?
-
Fife
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Post
by Fife » Sun May 13, 2018 4:09 pm
You can call it rational or irrational, or whatever you please. If I had a son, he would not be attending any voluntary function of any kind with an openly gay male leader.
I have a now-adult daughter, and I never had that question come up; outside of her getting her hair did. Which actually led to some really funny discussions.
:goteam: :drunk:
-
Fife
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Post
by Fife » Sun May 13, 2018 4:15 pm
-
JohnDonne
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:06 am
Post
by JohnDonne » Sun May 13, 2018 4:35 pm
That's your right and your choice, it's disappointing that even in the face of hypothetical evidence you would not give it a rethink.
But if anybody could find any case of an openly gay scout leader molesting boys, that would be interesting. We have many cases of straight identified scout leaders doing just that. I'm asking for just one case.
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Sun May 13, 2018 5:11 pm
JohnDonne wrote: ↑Sun May 13, 2018 3:48 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu May 10, 2018 7:14 pm
Okeefenokee wrote:I like how I just posted two more rape stories from the past two years and he pretends it's all ancient history.
The whole reason the scouts tried to stop gay leaders from getting in is because they knew they had a rape problem they were keeping hidden.
They can't just admit that homosexuals tend to commit more sexual assault than heterosexuals by a pretty large percentage.
That's why everything is a pedophile. Homosexuals prey on teen boys and girls. They get caught. The left cries about a pedo problem because they definitely don't want to talk about the problems with homosexuality.
What do you mean homosexuals prey on teen boys and girls? Are you saying open homosexuals or closet homosexuals? And how would you know if they’re closet if they prey on girls? And do you understand the term bisexuality?
Both.
The sexual assault rate against teens committed by homosexuals is actually pretty high relative to their percentage of the population. They are FAR more likely to assault your teens than anybody else.
-
JohnDonne
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:06 am
Post
by JohnDonne » Sun May 13, 2018 5:23 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sun May 13, 2018 5:11 pm
JohnDonne wrote: ↑Sun May 13, 2018 3:48 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu May 10, 2018 7:14 pm
They can't just admit that homosexuals tend to commit more sexual assault than heterosexuals by a pretty large percentage.
That's why everything is a pedophile. Homosexuals prey on teen boys and girls. They get caught. The left cries about a pedo problem because they definitely don't want to talk about the problems with homosexuality.
What do you mean homosexuals prey on teen boys and girls? Are you saying open homosexuals or closet homosexuals? And how would you know if they’re closet if they prey on girls? And do you understand the term bisexuality?
Both.
The sexual assault rate against teens committed by homosexuals is actually pretty high relative to their percentage of the population. They are FAR more likely to assault your teens than anybody else.
Prove it is both groups
-
Fife
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Post
by Fife » Sun May 13, 2018 5:28 pm
A posteriori AIDS, everyone.
Fuck. Yo. Studies.
-
JohnDonne
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:06 am
Post
by JohnDonne » Sun May 13, 2018 5:34 pm
Fife wrote: ↑Sun May 13, 2018 5:28 pm
A posteriori AIDS, everyone.
Fuck. Yo. Studies.
That’s a great quip.
Argument, not so much.