2018 Mid-Term Elections

[The Conservative]

At this point in time, they are just being dishonest...

Screen Shot 2018-11-06 at 11.09.23 PM.png

Screen Shot 2018-11-06 at 11.09.34 PM.png

[Zlaxer]

I find it bizarre that for all the talk Democrats do about slavery, racism, and control that their sole focus is to get everyone on the government ticket as much as possible ? Modern-day folks willingly signing up to become slaves to the government. Never in my lifetime would I imagine I'd see a nation of people born into freedom and liberty so desperately seeking to be controlled by the elite few in DC. Just bizarro times these days.

Real simple dude - proles are fucking dumb....too dumb for liberty.

[Zlaxer]

At this point in time, they are just being dishonest...

Screen Shot 2018-11-06 at 11.09.23 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-11-06 at 11.09.34 PM.png

Drudge is showing DNC house by 34.

[The Conservative]

At this point in time, they are just being dishonest...

Screen Shot 2018-11-06 at 11.09.23 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-11-06 at 11.09.34 PM.png

Drudge is showing DNC house by 34.

Mine is from the NY Times so take it with what you will.

[Zlaxer]

Election shows its just a matter of time before the GOP can't win anymore due to demographics.....

I don't think the results show that at all. The House is fickle by design. It'll flip back soon enough.

What are you basing this on?

[Ph64]

Yeah I'm a bit surprised on the Amendment results. I vote yes on some but not all.

I voted yes on four of them. I'm also shocked they all passed. Some of them were so convoluted I voted no out of disgust. Can't even find a distantly remote correlation between vaping and off-shore drilling, and that was the best of the bundled choices.

I'm disappointed by the gambling one, because it was funded by Disney & The Seminoles, so, clearly a loss for the proles. Well produced campaign, though.

I'd hit no on anything that was such a convoluted mess.

We had 2 in CT, I voted yes for both.

Question 1: Shall the Constitution of the State be amended to ensure (1) that all moneys contained in the Special Transportation Fund be used solely for transportation purposes, including the payment of debts of the state incurred for transportation purposes, and (2) that sources of funds deposited in the Special Transportation Fund be deposited in said fund so long as such sources are authorized by statute to be collected or received by the state?

Question 2: Shall the Constitution of the State be amended to require (1) a public hearing and the enactment of legislation limited in subject matter to the transfer, sale or disposition of state-owned or state-controlled real property or interests in real property in order for the General Assembly to require a state agency to sell, transfer or dispose of any real property or interest in real property that is under the custody or control of the agency, and (2) if such property is under the custody or control of the Department of Agriculture or the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, that such enactment of legislation be passed by a two-thirds vote of the total membership of each house of the General Assembly?

Both seemed fairly straightforward. The 1st was to try and ward off politicians wanting to raid the transportation funds for other things. The 2nd a reaction to some bad land deals they tried to make in the past.

[Zlaxer]

Yeah I'm a bit surprised on the Amendment results. I vote yes on some but not all.

I voted yes on four of them. I'm also shocked they all passed. Some of them were so convoluted I voted no out of disgust. Can't even find a distantly remote correlation between vaping and off-shore drilling, and that was the best of the bundled choices.

I'm disappointed by the gambling one, because it was funded by Disney & The Seminoles, so, clearly a loss for the proles. Well produced campaign, though.

I'd hit no on anything that was such a convoluted mess.

We had 2 in CT, I voted yes for both.

Question 1: Shall the Constitution of the State be amended to ensure (1) that all moneys contained in the Special Transportation Fund be used solely for transportation purposes, including the payment of debts of the state incurred for transportation purposes, and (2) that sources of funds deposited in the Special Transportation Fund be deposited in said fund so long as such sources are authorized by statute to be collected or received by the state?

Question 2: Shall the Constitution of the State be amended to require (1) a public hearing and the enactment of legislation limited in subject matter to the transfer, sale or disposition of state-owned or state-controlled real property or interests in real property in order for the General Assembly to require a state agency to sell, transfer or dispose of any real property or interest in real property that is under the custody or control of the agency, and (2) if such property is under the custody or control of the Department of Agriculture or the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, that such enactment of legislation be passed by a two-thirds vote of the total membership of each house of the General Assembly?

Both seemed fairly straightforward. The 1st was to try and ward off politicians wanting to raid the transportation funds for other things. The 2nd a reaction to some bad land deals they tried to make in the past.

So did I - but don't you see the issue?

Question 1: Shall the Constitution of the State be amended to ensure (1) that all moneys contained in the Special Transportation Fund be used solely for transportation purposes, including the payment of debts of the state incurred for transportation purposes, and (2) that sources of funds deposited in the Special Transportation Fund be deposited in said fund so long as such sources are authorized by statute to be collected or received by the state?

[clubgop]

Nelson all but done. Kavanaugh revenge incoming.

[TheReal_ND]

PELOSI NO IM JUST A TENDER BOY

[Zlaxer]

@Ph64 tolls are coming..... higher income taxes...higher sales tax....gas tax...etc....fuck it - this state is the CA of the East.