Montegriffo wrote: It's not what it is but how you are using it. Being Breitbart there is no context to the story about the potato peeler, if it was being used to threaten harm then a potato peeler is an offensive weapon.
I can't believe you support these policies. It's madness.
Just explaining the law as it is applied. If this lad was arrested for having a potato peeler in his pocket that is clearly overreach. If he was waving it around trying to stab someone then clearly he was using it as an offensive weapon. The article gives no context. The law on knives states that you can carry one with a blade of less than 3 inches legally (unless you are under 18). A peeler cannot be classed as a knife with a blade over 3 inches so I presume he was threatening someone with it.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:You can kill someone with a pencil, a broom, a plastic bag - any household object. These laws are worse than pointless.
A leg of frozen lamb is a tasty Sunday lunch until I beat you to death with it, at that point it becomes a deadly weapon.
In law it is the difference between assault and assault with an offensive weapon. The latter carries a heavier sentence. Not pointless at all.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
A British man was arrested Saturday after he was found walking the streets of Dunfermline, Scotland, with a potato peeler.
Scott Walker, 39, appeared before the Dunfermline Sheriff Court Monday, where he was charged under Criminal Law Act 1995 for carrying “an article which had a blade or which was sharply pointed, namely a potato peeler,” the Dunfermline Press reported.
The man faces up to four years in prison for carrying the kitchen utensil in public without good reason.
He was *GASP* walking the streets! Clearly with intention to murder hundreds with his dangerous blade. Lock him up before he does real damage, like, with a rolling pin!!!
Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?
A British man was arrested Saturday after he was found walking the streets of Dunfermline, Scotland, with a potato peeler.
Scott Walker, 39, appeared before the Dunfermline Sheriff Court Monday, where he was charged under Criminal Law Act 1995 for carrying “an article which had a blade or which was sharply pointed, namely a potato peeler,” the Dunfermline Press reported.
The man faces up to four years in prison for carrying the kitchen utensil in public without good reason.
He was *GASP* walking the streets! Clearly with intention to murder hundreds with his dangerous blade. Lock him up before he does real damage, like, with a rolling pin!!!
The headline of your article says ''weilding'' a peeler. That implies he was waving it about or threatening someone with it.
Sometimes details matter. That article is also omitting any details of his arrest.
Personally I'm more woried about the lead content in my port decanter than the risk of 4 years in prison for carrying a potato peeler.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Montegriffo wrote: It's not what it is but how you are using it. Being Breitbart there is no context to the story about the potato peeler, if it was being used to threaten harm then a potato peeler is an offensive weapon.
I can't believe you support these policies. It's madness.
You know what Kanye said about slaves wanting to be slaves...
He was talking about monte
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
Montegriffo wrote:
The headline of your article says ''weilding'' a peeler.
If only he had a constitutional right to carry a firearm, then we'd all be safer.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.